Users must demand more from agencies to ensure that
recommended candidates are suitable, says Jerry Cave
For years organisations have complained about the
paucity of staff with good IT skills.
The apparent lack of good permanent staff led to the contractor
boom of the 1990s and has recently contributed to the spate of
outsourcing agreements, as organisations opt to shift the IT
employee burden to a third party, whatever the business cost.
But this belief that IT skills are thin on the ground is a myth
created in no small part by the recruitment agencies that have a
stranglehold over the industry. They use it to encourage high rates
and convince employers to accept candidates irrespective of their
suitability for a specific role. The problem is exacerbated because
many recruitment consultants do not understand IT and selection
techniques are not rigorous enough.
Recruitment consultants often have no technology training and do
not read the trade press in which most of the job advertisements
are placed. Therefore, how can consultants understand the job
specification, let alone identify the best candidates?
But having undertaken the process of wading through up to 10
irrelevant CVs for each position and endured a couple of
interviews, many organisations feel obliged to select at least one
of these people, however lacking in appropriate expertise they may
be.
Why are organisations at every level, from blue chip to small
and medium-sized firms, prepared to accept this haphazard
recruitment of the people that design, develop and support these
critical systems?
Part of the problem is that the recruitment consultancy industry
is driven by commission.
Although internet-based job advertising is undoubtedly on the
increase, most of the IT recruitment market, even up to senior
technical positions, is managed by agents who are 100%
sales-focused. They receive a fee based on placing people with a
company and tend to besiege organisations with unprompted calls to
promote CVs.
But employers are also culpable. Not only have they accepted a
poor level of service, they also continue to make demands that
undermine the service concept.
Many organisations stipulate a turnaround time as part of the
recruitment contract. What nonsense. By specifying that CVs must be
received within 48 hours and the vacancy filled within two weeks,
organisations are immediately precluding all the people already
employed because they will be on a four-week notice period.
Recruitment consultants need the IT expertise to interpret job
requirements and assess candidates. These candidates should also
undergo face-to-face assessment and complete detailed
questionnaires that encompass technical and industry experience to
improve the accuracy of the matching process. Effective assessment
of candidate CVs should ensure that no more than three CVs for each
position are sent to the client - all of which should be
relevant.
For senior, high-price technical positions, the combination of
search and select techniques with a headhunter, coupled with a
traditional recruitment consultancy, can provide real benefits.
But the fact that a slapdash approach to recruitment continued
during the downturn when the market was flush with excellent people
is extremely concerning.
IT departments need to take a more proactive approach to
demanding and paying for service from recruitment companies if they
want to employ the calibre of people required to support
business-critical IT systems.
Jerry Cave is director at IT skills and services company
Plan-Net