Mary KingmanSoapbox
With the growth of the Internet, a new way of managing
procurement has appeared in the form of market sites. These
services promise to link buyer and supplier in an end-to-end chain
of electronic trading. Businesses are being urged to hand control
of procurement over to third parties combining the role of IT
supplier and catalogue aggregator.
For some, the idea of outsourcing procurement may be attractive.
Others may balk at delegating responsibility for strategic supplier
relationships to a software provider.
Instead of increasing choice and shortening the supply chain,
the market-site model has the opposite effect. The e-procurement
supplier controls the software you need to use to buy from its
site. This software won't work on other market sites or on
individual suppliers' sites. On the Internet, you need to choose
which electronic catalogue supplier to use and stick with it.
Suppliers have to meet criteria set by the market-site operator
to set up shop. If your preferred suppliers don't meet those
criteria, you may not be able to deal with them electronically.
Wouldn't it be better if the buyer could use a single interface
to connect to numerous suppliers' sites? If the supplier doesn't
want to operate such a site and chooses to go with an electronic
catalogue aggregator, fine, then you connect to them too.
The technology exists to rebuild the e-procurement model in a
form that suits supplier and buyer. The only people it won't suit
are the market-site suppliers. Until this transformation has taken
place, businesses will continue to rely on traditional methods of
procurement and will continue to waste money.
Mary Kingman is business development director at
e-procurement specialist Tranmit