
Facebook has become the 'vanilla' social sitemillions use as readily ase-mail,whileMySpaceandYouTubedominate the consumer media, andLinkedInthe business market. ThatFacebook
, like e-mail, is 'beyond fashion' may be key to its success:
roughly half of its users log on every day, saysfounder
and CEO Mark Zuckerberg,whoestablished
the company in 2004 while a student at
Harvard.
Like the
World Wide
Web itself, Facebook's roots were in academic communication
then, but from its student beginnings just five years ago the
Palo Alto-based company has grown to employ over 700 people -
it is aiming for 1,000 or more in 2009 - and achieved 2008 revenues
estimated at $300 million. So is the Facebook revolution
unstoppable?
-
The social graph
-
Growth but at what cost?
-
A measurement of true success
1 The social graph
The about-face in behaviour that social networking has inspired
has been rapid and extraordinary. Ten years ago, the idea that
millions of people would voluntarily share their private contacts
with the world would have been unthinkable,
especially in business. Facebook and its rivals trade on what
we can term 'mass proximity' to - and privileged insight into - an
individual's world. Beyond that, of course, Facebook and its peers
are powerful, stable platforms for application development.
Facebook says it aims to be "the social graph" of the 21st
century. Its usage has clearly become integrated into many people's
lives, notably in the UK where its adoption is nearly three times
that of its main rival,
MySpace.
However, the exact number of global users is unclear: at the
November 2008
Web 2.0 forum in San Francisco, Facebook claimed over 120
million users (18.4 million in the UK), while
MySpace was quoted as having
118 million users globally (7.8 million in the UK). In January
2009, however, Zuckerberg announced that passing 150 million users
had been a "significant milestone" for the company.
2 Growth but at what
cost?
If all those figures are correct, they suggest Facebook is
growing at over 10% a month, but this should be taken with a pinch
of salt: duplicate profiles are legion, while TechCrunch traffic
statistics puts the company's US growth rate at just 3.8% and
slowing. ComScore statistics put MySpace ahead in the US and
worldwide, but suggest Facebook will become the largest social
network by 2010.
It is not just about personal profiles, however. Well
over 130,000 businesses make either
formal or informal use of Facebook as
a networking
tool.
Despite the impressive uptake, the revenue models for it and
other social networks remain unclear. In November, analysts at IDC
found most users ignore adverts on social sites, despite the fact
that more than 75% of them visit at least once a week and 61% spend
over 30 minutes online each visit.
Social-network adverts also generate fewer click-throughs - 57%
versus the web average of 79% - and only 11% of those translate
into purchases (compared with 23% elsewhere). IDC found that only
3% of users would be willing to expose their private networks to
advertisers, and so the ability to create any leverage from those
millions of personal profiles remains untapped.
3 A measurement of true
success
Put another way, 150 million users and $300 million in revenue
means two dollars per user per annum. Of course, $300 million
revenue after five years' trading is an astonishing achievement,
but the underlying story reveals the social networks challenge: how
to persuade all those users - as opposed to business partners - to
spend money? Or does Facebook even care?
At the 2008 Web 2.0 forum, Facebook and MySpace took to the
conference stage.
MySpace CEO
Chris DeWolfe saw expanding advertising as his goal, while
Zuckerberg identified aggressive global expansion.
"Growth is a
strategic thing for us," said Zuckerberg. "We're not as focused
on optimising revenue. People have said we're not thinking about
it, but that's completely wrong. We have thousands and thousands of
advertisers coming to the site and reaching people."
One part of Facebook's underlying business model was revealed
just two days earlier at the annual Dreamforce summit of
software as a service (SaaS) firm, Salesforce.com. The two
companies announced a suite of tools to marry Salesforce.com's
business productivity applications to what was described as the
"interpersonal power" of social networks.
According to
Facebook's
COO Sheryl Sandberg: "Facebook's users are always eager to try
new applications that can improve their ability to connect and
share in a trusted environment... our work will give
Salesforce.com's 100,000 developers the tools to create and deliver
a new class of business applications for Facebook's 120 million [in
November 2008] active users."
In other words, if businesses have both a stable platform and a
community that it serves, then they can build native applications.
Zuckerberg is betting that Facebook-style behaviour will spread to
mainstream business.