Thought for the day: Trustworthy for some

Simon Moores considers the implications of a generic security product from Microsoft.

Simon Moores  

A generic security solution would be good news for our PCs but bad news for the competition, particularly if it carries the Microsoft logo, says Simon Moores.



It was a chance comment that set me thinking. A well-placed friend of mine in the information security business remarked that once Microsoft started to roll out its own anti-virus solutions, the line of new antitrust litigants would bring Washington traffic to a standstill.

You’ll remember that Microsoft bought Romanian antivirus company GeCAD in the summer as part of its continued Trustworthy Computing drive. At the time, there were quiet murmurs of concern from some, but the industry mostly pulled together and supported the move.

The principal antivirus shops appeared unruffled and talked bravely about value-add services and how no single supplier, including Microsoft, had a universal solution to the information security problem that faces us today.

So the big picture seems to be one where Microsoft delivers software which is, as the mantra goes, is secure by design, secure by default and secure by deployment. It then stirs in a basic firewall and offers antivirus, rather like MSN, by subscription to those who want it, making sure that any offer is equivalent in price to that being offered by everyone else happily involved in making billions of dollars from the insecurity business.

I rather suspect that Microsoft might simply prefer to build fundamental security and antivirus capability into the Windows operating system, or even give it away in the shape of add-ons, ensuring that security, like fresh air, is available to anyone who might want it.

This is not a concession or an admission that Windows is any better or worse than any other platform, simply a recognition that in a vulnerable environment, every effort has to be made to protect the customer.

But Microsoft is still not out of the shadow of the Netscape antitrust case, where it was revealed that it gave away Internet Explorer as a deliberate spoiling strategy and consequently destroyed the market for Netscape Navigator.

So, if Microsoft, in a grand gesture, suddenly declared that in the customer’s interest universal antivirus would be free or incredibly cheap, there would be a howl of outrage from every company profiting from the unhappy state of information security in a largely Microsoft world.

This is roughly measured in terms of $50 per seat, per year for every internet-connected PC on the face of the planet that chooses some form of anti-virus protection. Of course, many still don’t because of the costs involved.

Think about it for a moment. Microsoft might possibly want to put the past behind it and play the responsible citizen, pouring billions of dollars into the fight against computer crime. I might not hear cheering, but I do see some nods of approval. After all, better late than never and, if the growth of a ballooning infosec budget can be reversed even a little, then even better for business.

What I think might happen is that Microsoft is going to find itself having to compete in the information security business, not because it might wish to but because the law says it has to. This is rather like one large drugs company wishing to deliver a cheap generic cure for a disease and rival companies going to court and having such a measure declared anti-competitive and illegal.

The future then for everyone else might be one where we continue to pay more for basic information security as a value-added benefit, in addition to the high cost of any Windows licence, because a court might decide that we have to, in the interests of fair competition in the computer industry. Does that seem right?

What do you think?

Would you be in favour of a security product from Microsoft?  Tell us in an e-mail >> reserves the right to edit and publish answers on the website. Please state if your answer is not for publication.

Setting the world to rights with the collected thoughts and opinions of leading industry analyst Dr Simon Moores of Zentelligence.

Acting globally, Zentelligence (Research) advises governments, suppliers, business and the media on the evolution, application and delivery of leading-edge technologies and specialises in the areas of eGovernment and information security.

For further information on Zentelligence and its research, presentation and analyst services visit 

Read more on IT strategy