It was William Gibson’s novel Neuromancer that offered us an alternative vision of a connected future. A new dimension called cyberspace where the clever criminals thrived.
We are now uncomfortably close to the future described in the pages of Gibson’s prophetic novel. So close that Whitehall is, reportedly, giving serious thought to the idea of recruiting a new kind of special constable.
The "cyberspecials" would be made up of volunteers from the IT industry who might be able to assist the police in fighting rising crime over the internet.
In principle, the argument looks good to the public. More police officers, if not on the streets, then in cyberspace instead, even if they are still only civilian computer experts trained in gathering evidence to the same forensic standards as the police.
In practice, the idea strikes me as impractical, with suspiciously more spin than substance. The unusual thing about the suggestion is that this is the first time I have seen it raised in public as a serious proposal and nothing I have heard from my friends in the police so far suggests that they need to conscript civilian "experts" from the IT industry to assist in their investigations.
I am not entirely sure what crimes these cyberspecials might be called upon to tackle that the police can’t already get in the way of direct assistance or secondment from industry.
The National Hi-Tech Crime Unit (NHTCU) deals with serious and organised crime and this can overlap into investigations into paedophilia, as we recently witnessed with the success of Operation Ore.
Nobody I know has suggested that the NHTCU is under-resourced. Quite the contrary, as I am told the NHTCU has never needed to call on the assistance of industry, not to say that it wouldn’t if it felt it had to.
Industry in general is more than happy to make available the highly specialised skills the police might need in an investigation. As an example, the police might ask to "borrow" an expert on a particularly unusual or esoteric operating system or aspect of commercial encryption.
There is another aspect of concern regarding special constables. Specials are minimally compensated for their work and so who, in the busy world of IT, is likely to have the available bandwidth to offer time for free or at police pay levels? This kind of role is more likely to attract the very opposite of the kind of person that the police might want to attract in the first place.
Who will be responsible for the standards and training of cyberspecials and how would they be compensated? What will the cost to the taxpayer be?
The police would need people with a professional track record of both experience and integrity if they are to deal with evidence in criminal cases. If I’m honest, the cyberspecials idea, in its present form, is an absolute can of worms which is unlikely to deliver the expertise the Police don’t yet feel they need in dealing with serious and organised computer crime.
A continued programme of secondment and close co-operation with industry still seems to work best in my mind, but then the Home Office constantly comes up with off-the-wall ideas. On this occasion, however, someone may have been inhaling the evidence.
What do you think?
Do you think there's a need for cyberspecials? Will you be signing up? Tell us in an e-mail >> ComputerWeekly.com reserves the right to edit and publish answers on the website. Please state if your answer is not for publication.
Setting the world to rights with the collected thoughts and opinions of leading industry analyst Dr Simon Moores of Zentelligence.
Acting globally, Zentelligence (Research) advises governments, suppliers, business and the media on the evolution, application and delivery of leading-edge technologies and specialises in the areas of eGovernment and information security.
For further information on Zentelligence and its research, presentation and analyst services visit www.zentelligence.com