Petrovich12 - Fotolia
When Edward Snowden released documents showing the extraordinary scale of UK and US surveillance on ordinary people back in 2013, there were many in the intelligence agencies who were rightly worried that their surveillance powers would be challenged in the courts.
By submitting your personal information, you agree that TechTarget and its partners may contact you regarding relevant content, products and special offers.
Four years later, a slew of court cases brought by Privacy International, Liberty, other campaigning groups and courageous individuals are shedding new light on the practices of the secret state, and are beginning – but only beginning – to establish where the limits of state intrusion should lie.
New laws and state powers introduced to combat terrorism have quietly eroded the right to privacy and due process, with sometimes Kafkaesque consequences for those individuals unlucky enough to be caught up in the legal machinery.
Muhammad Rabbani, international director of advocacy group Cage, said no after he was stopped and questioned and ordered to disclose his computer passwords, under a law that permits police to stop people and seize their computer equipment in airports without any grounds for suspicion.
And Lauri Love, a brilliant 32-year-old engineering student, is fighting to be tried in the UK – as the law allows – rather face hacking charges in the US, where the prisons would struggle to prevent his potential suicide or meet his medical needs.
Their battles will become important milestones in setting the boundaries between the rights of the individual and the rights of the state, and will ultimately decide what liberties society is prepared to sacrifice for the promise of greater security.
Confidential communications show terror group’s supporters are turning to simple mobile phone messaging apps to exchange messages and distribute propaganda.
A secret court will decide whether intelligence agencies are “unlawfully” sharing huge datasets containing sensitive information about the population with industry, government departments and overseas intelligence services.
Intelligence commissioners did not need technical expertise or support staff to check whether GCHQ and MI5 were lawfully sharing huge databases, court told.
The UK approved an export licence for the sale of mobile phone surveillance equipment from Gamma International UK to Macedonia – while the country was engaged in an illegal phone-tapping programme that eventually brought down the Macedonian government.
Engineering student Lauri Love should be tried in the UK, court hears, as new evidence is presented on the “medieval” conditions in US jails for people with medical problems.
Schedule 7 of the Terrorism Act allows police to stop, search and question anyone, and require them to hand over their computers, phones and passwords, without cause for suspicion. Muhammad Rabbani, international director of advocacy group Cage, was convicted in court when he refused.
Ten human rights organisations challenge lawfulness of UK surveillance legislation and mass internet surveillance by UK intelligence agencies in Strasbourg court.
Natasha Love: Lauri Love should face trial over hacking allegations in a British court, rather than be extradited to the US, where his extraordinary skills will be lost to society, says his younger sister.
The US government says it “has issues” with an Irish High Court ruling, which will test the legality of EU-US data transfers as Facebook considers an appeal to Supreme Court.
Irish data protection commissioner Helen Dixon has neatly avoided having to deal with the US surveillance of Facebook users in Europe by referring a complaint by Austrian lawyer Max Schrems to the European Court of Justice.