Squeezing more out of your network

Suppliers would love the network manager to throw money at every problem on the network. But couldn't you get the current set-up...

Suppliers would love the network manager to throw money at every problem on the network. But couldn't you get the current set-up to perform better? asks Nick Booth

If any good came out of the entire year 2000 fiasco it was that it forced companies to take stock of the inventory of hardware and software on their networks. After all, it's a lot easier to "fight fires" when you know where the danger areas are located.

In fact, a network manager's job shouldn't actually be this reactive, it just works out that way. By having a more comprehensive knowledge of the organisation's IT infrastructure, the network manager may well be able to compensate for a depleted IT budget by getting the existing network to work harder.

There are two ways in which the effectiveness of the network can be increased. By changing the way applications use the network, you can reduce the burden on it, which in turn reduces the amount of traffic it has to carry. On the other hand, you can soup up the performance of the network by either adding more hardware and bandwidth, or tuning your existing infrastructure. Post Y2K, many network managers are finding the funds for expansion just aren't there. The only option then is to redesign what you've got.

"If you want to change the way applications make use of the network, you'll have to re-architect the bandwidth-hungry applications," says Darren Prince, technical manager for network performance supplier Smarts.

This isn't always practical, as it can involve a lot of work and disruption while the software is re-configured or ported elsewhere on the network. The time lost due to disruption can be more expensive than adding to the network.

The quality of service mechanisms on a network's routers and switches are classically under-utilised, says Prince, possibly because this was a secondary consideration when these devices were installed. The only other method of controlling the way applications flood the network with their data packets is to use dedicated traffic-shaping devices. Companies such as Xedia sell devices that will do this very efficiently; but they cost several thousand pounds and many network managers are told to improve performance without spending any money.

If applications make demands on network bandwidth, the alternative strategy is to increase the supply. This means identifying the weak links on the network. Companies such as Jyra Research will run one-off network checks, sending intelligent agents out to identify which devices are slowing the network down. This will tell you whether you need faster CPUs, more memory or faster backplanes on your servers or switches. Upgrading items like these will not break the bank.

It is not always a bad idea to throw money at a problem. The low cost of bandwidth on a local area network will often make it more worthwhile to install new equipment rather than allocate precious man hours re-configuring it. To some extent, it could be more cost effective to spend money to solve a problem in the local area, because it won't cost much, and could be a lot quicker.

The return on investment for IT equipment diminishes in proportion to the amount of kit you buy. Besides which, networks are like motorways; as soon as you build one, users find ways of filling them up. Any additions you make are expensive, and soon become clogged with extra traffic. "Bandwidth-hungry applications will still hog all the available bandwidth, no matter how much you widen the pipes," says Prince.

The key then, is to devise a policy, not just for the way users access the network, but for the configuration and load balancing rules devised too. Many suppliers won't tell you this, because it's in their interest for you to keep issuing cheques for more and more hardware, but the majority of networks in the UK are acutely under-utilised.

However, they do get used. A single network is called on to do all kinds of things the original infrastructure wasn't designed for. They have to support an increasingly diverse set of applications and services, all of which have been added incrementally. Users always want everything tomorrow, which is why network managers shouldn't be blamed if they had an attitude of "bung it on now and worry about it later". The problem is there are now users with very different needs, from real-time transaction processing applications to background Web browsing to multimedia conferencing, all of which have an impact on the business at different times.

"The issue facing network managers is not whether the network is up, but whether the right services are available to the right users at an acceptable level of performance," says Charles Muirhead, founder of Orchestream.

Muirhead developed Orchestream in reaction to the problems of the modern network, and being able to prioritise networks. Though a supplier of "policy management" tools, Orchestream nevertheless acknowledges that most IT budgets are already stretched to the limit.

"There's a huge disparity between what companies want their networks to do and the amount they plan on spending to achieve those results. So network provision is no longer an acceptable solution for service level demands," says Muirhead.

According to market analyst Gartner, networking costs are typically 100% over budget. As this article proposes you tackle your problems without spending any more money, we will overlook the temptation to spend money on a network policy management tool (such as Orchestream's) in favour of devising a policy of deploying the existing manpower and equipment more effectively.

The first problem you should tackle, advises Phil Tee, founder of network performance management specialist Riversoft, is to check the configuration of products that have lain untouched since they were installed. "It is very common to find that comms devices, especially across the wide area, are on default settings or haven't been updated," says Tee. "You often find routers aren't configured to choose the cheapest lines to send data down. The most common cause of pouring money down the drain is ISDN; the number of people who've no idea how much their failover system of ISDN backup is racking up their bills is amazing."

This is understandable really, given the amount of time that configuring a router can take. Some people, says Tee, will waste days trying to find the right combination of settings. "That is why you should try and get the people who sell you the device to pre-configure it before they send it to you," says Tee, "It'll save you a lot of time and money if you get the supplier to do it." Frequently, the supplier will be happy to do this as part of their pre or post sales support service.

If you are going to spend a small fraction of your budget, says Tee, it is best to spend it on getting your network tuned up. If your network is firing on all cylinders, you're less likely to keep fuelling the demand for more bandwidth.

If misconfigured devices are the biggest cause of wasted resources, then lack of understanding of the needs of applications is not far behind. Every application is mission critical these days. Why install an application if it's not vital to the business? The trick is to be aware of their tolerances for latency. How can these users be kept waiting? When voice is sent over the data network the figure is 20 milliseconds. When it's e-mail messages, the figure is measured in minutes.

There are plenty of tools on the market that will allow you to prioritise traffic. The most recent tools to be launched are switches that examine the content of each data packet and decide, according to pre-determined rules governing different applications, what level of priority that packet gets in the traffic on the network. Time sensitive applications, like SAP or real time enquiries (such as an online purchase) are guaranteed bandwidth at all times. Whatever is left is shared among the other applications.

Security is a vital consideration but, in the course of a security policy, sometimes networks can do more harm than good. Firewalls, according to Darrell Woodward, security product manager at systems integrator Wick Hill, can slow down proceedings to the point where users give up using the system.

Most firewalls have a reporting mechanism that allows performance information to be generated. Many people make the mistake of assuming this is purely to tell them about attempted security breaches. They're wasting a powerful management tool, says Woodward. "It is important to read the firewall reports because they'll show you how your bandwidth is being eaten up. Reports will highlight the heavy users and the busy times of the day."

A major issue many network managers have to deal with is user culture. Many end-users start the day by reading their social e-mails and then responding to them, before embarking on their work. This would explain the pattern most companies experience, where e-mail usage is heaviest between 9am and 11am. There will be another surge after 2pm after which Web usage is at its heaviest.

Some companies legislate for this by allocating a maximum 2Mbytes for e-mail, the rest of the bandwidth being dedicated to business communications. Other companies have dedicated PCs for Web surfing, while others dedicate all bandwidth between 1pm and 2pm to Web surfing, which encourages users to do their personal surfing in their own time.

A heavy-handed approach to eliminating Web surfing will be counter productive. When more and more companies are looking to outsource their applications, and by-pass the IT manager, the worst thing the IT manager could possibly do is upset the users by getting bolshie about bandwidth usage.

A gentler method to encourage users to spend less time clogging up the network with their Web searches involves creative use of cache memory. "You may discover from your usage reports that a lot of people download something like Acrobat reader or a particularly large file from the Web," says Woodward. "The logical way around this is to provide it locally."

Top tips for beefing up your network

  • Find out a typical pattern of usage between departments

  • Set up a special surfing area

  • Voice compression technology will allow four times as much traffic to use the same bandwidth

  • Utilise your existing bandwidth by sending voice by day and data by night over the same wires

  • Separate networks for storage, such as storage area networks or network-attached storage can isolate the traffic as stored files are retrieved from a single location

  • Re-organise your applications

  • Prioritise traffic using quality of service options on switches

  • Upgrade poorly performing devices (such as server CPU, memory)

This was last published in June 2000

Read more on Network software

Start the conversation

Send me notifications when other members comment.

Please create a username to comment.

-ADS BY GOOGLE

SearchCIO

SearchSecurity

SearchNetworking

SearchDataCenter

SearchDataManagement

Close