Sarbox compliance costing companies


Sarbox compliance costing companies

Companies’ required investments to attain compliance with the Sarbanes-Oxley data security legislation has come at the expense of dealing with other security threats, according to the Information Security Forum (ISF).

The ISF has 260 corporate members worldwide, including half of the Fortune 100 companies in the US, who make up a significant number of firms that the Sarbanes-Oxley Act is aimed at. The report states that even though most ISF members are spending more than £5.7m ($10m) on complying with the US Sarbanes-Oxley legislation, many are facing problems in achieving full compliance and are also struggling to protect other areas of their business.

According to the ISF, the business imperative to comply with the data security legislation has also meant that in many cases the true cost of compliance was unknown. Problem areas that companies are struggling to overcome include poor documentation; informal controls and use of spreadsheets; lack of clarity when dealing with outsourcing providers; and insufficient understanding of the internal workings of large business applications.

Comments ISF consultant Andy Jones: “In the wake of financial scandals like Enron and WorldCom, the Sarbanes-Oxley Act was designed to improve corporate governance and accountability but has proved difficult to interpret for information security professionals. The diversion of information security attention from other risk areas to Sarbanes-Oxley compliance may lead to important business risks being neglected."

Email Alerts

Register now to receive IT-related news, guides and more, delivered to your inbox.
By submitting your personal information, you agree to receive emails regarding relevant products and special offers from TechTarget and its partners. You also agree that your personal information may be transferred and processed in the United States, and that you have read and agree to the Terms of Use and the Privacy Policy.

COMMENTS powered by Disqus  //  Commenting policy