News

EMC's ControlCenter supports vital storage systems

EMC has unveiled the latest version of its flagship storage management software, which it said offers "more complete support" for competing products such as arrays from Hewlett-Packard, Hitachi Data Systems and IBM, as well as Linux servers.

Version 5.2 of the ControlCenter software is also the first release that is compliant with the Storage Management Initiative Specification (SMI-S), a set of protocols designed to let storage management tools interoperate with hardware devices from different suppliers.

Although ControlCenter 5.2 cannot automatically grow or shrink storage for business applications on non-EMC arrays, it can perform so-called storage resource management functions, such as automatic discovery of hardware and monitoring of its health and utilisation. The software can also follow the performance and report on HDS arrays and Linux hosts.

Dennis Hoffman, vice-president of product marketing for EMC's software products, said the upgrade "fills out" ControlCenter's ability to troubleshoot multi-supplier storage-area networks.

EMC already supported Hitachi's 9500V midrange arrays and HP's StorageWorks XP512 and XP1024 devices. Now, it has added management support for HP's XP48 array - a scaled-down version of the XP512 - and Hitachi's high-end 9900V product line, plus storage switches from Cisco Systems.

Tony Asaro, an analyst at Enterprise Storage Group, said the most impressive addition to ControlCenter is a wizard-driven installation process.

During an upgrade test of Version 5.2, "our backup administrator, with no previous ControlCenter experience, performed the initial installation on two ControlCenter infrastructure servers in less than an hour," Asaro said.

By comparison, the last upgrade of ControlCenter on 35 hosts required "lots of user intervention over three days", he said.

Barry Ader, director of software product marketing at EMC, said the interoperability with the HDS, IBM and HP hardware is based on application programming interfaces and not SMI-S.

"We'd love for the SMI standard to evolve to the point ... where we can do performance reporting across an entire set of arrays," he added.

Lucas Mearian writes for Computerworld


Email Alerts

Register now to receive ComputerWeekly.com IT-related news, guides and more, delivered to your inbox.
By submitting you agree to receive email from TechTarget and its partners. If you reside outside of the United States, you consent to having your personal data transferred to and processed in the United States. Privacy
 

COMMENTS powered by Disqus  //  Commenting policy