Wi-Max in danger of becoming overhyped

Feature

Wi-Max in danger of becoming overhyped

The WiMax mobile wireless standard is gaining support among telecoms companies, but industry observers are concerned there is a risk of it becoming over-hyped.

The fixed side of WiMax is well along the path to commercialisation, but mobile WiMax will not be in wide use until after 2009, according to Gartner.

"It's very easy, given the huge amount of WiMax hype at the moment, to see WiMax as the next big thing after 3G," said Gartner analyst Ian Keene. "But that's not the case - it's a fixed wireless solution, an alternative to DSL. Mobile WiMax is a new cellular technology, and it's got a heck of a long way to go."

WiMax, based on the IEEE 802.16 group of standards, is intended to replace two distinct types of wireless broadband technology: fixed wireless, which could compete with or supplement ADSL, cable and leased lines, and mobile wireless, which makes broadband speeds available anywhere in a coverage area, including moving vehicles or public places. Mobile WiMax could complement 3G and Wi-Fi hotspots.

The standard is designed to make equipment less expensive and more interoperable, which would improve the business case for building networks. Equipment using the fixed 802.16d standard will arrive this year, and be certified next year. the WiMax Forum has promised that a relatively easy upgrade will add on mobile 802.16e capabilities, but 802.16e equipment will not be ready for another three years or so.

The WiMax Forum, the industry group promoting WiMax, got a boost on Monday when BT and France T él écom became members, along with Qwest Communications International, Reliance Telecom and XO Communications.

The official support of BT and T él écom will be valuable, since service providers are, necessarily, WiMax's target customers, but both operators see WiMax as a supplement to their existing wired networks.

Operators who want mobile broadband are more ambiguous in their attitudes to WiMax. Verizon Communications, Sprint and Nextel Communications, for example, have all said they are interested in mobile broadband but none are WiMax Forum members.

Since February, Nextel has been conducting trials of a proprietary technology from Flarion in the US, and the company emphasised that mobility is key to its offering.

"This is for customers who don't want to be tied to their desk or their office. You can go anywhere and use this service," said Nextel spokesman Chris Grandis. "It's beyond 3G."

Nextel also offers a wireless data card for laptops, operating at dial-up speeds, and plans to use Motorola's WiDEN technology to quadruple bandwidth, in the second half of this year.

Sprint and Verizon are toying with high-speed cellular technologies such as EV-DO while waiting to see if anything promising emerges from WiMax efforts, but could just as easily use proprietary equipment if it is more cost effective, the companies have said.

"We do keep an eye on WiMax as we do all new technologies," said Sprint spokesman Charles Fleckenstein. "If it makes business sense to move forward in this area, Sprint will do so."

In Europe, where 3G rollouts are already well advanced, wireless operators such as Vodafone Group and T-Mobile International have even less incentive to jump on board a mobile technology that is years away, said IDC analyst Jan Hein Bakkers.

"We don't think there will be any standardised [mobile WiMax] products before 2007," he said. "By that time there will be a lot of Wi-Fi hotspots out there already, and operators will have more UMTS [a 3G standard] networks. I don't see WiMax bringing that much additional value."

Others predicted more service providers will get on board the WiMax bandwagon, but agreed that it is still unclear what role WiMax will play. "It's a very new technology, and operators are not absolutely certain where it fits in with the other parts of the jigsaw puzzle, vis-a-vis 3G, Wi-Fi hotspots and so on," said Infonetics analyst Richard Webb.

Fixed WiMax has a more immediate potential for success, analysts said, because it will provide services similar to existing wireless broadband, while introducing lower costs and equipment interoperability.

Small wireless ISPs such as Irish Broadband in Dublin, NextWeb in California and TowerStream on the US east coast are offering wireless services that compete with existing wired offerings. A survey published this week by ABI Research found that more than half of small wireless ISPs planned to deploy WiMax equipment as soon as it is available to reduce equipment costs.

Larger Western European telcos primarily want WiMax to fill in the gaps in their wired networks. Earlier this week BT said it would use a combination of ADSL and a WiMax-like system from Alvarion to provide broadband across Northern Ireland. BT has said it is interested in migrating to WiMax-standard gear.

Some analysts see this as a shrinking niche. BT also announced this week it will enable another 1,128 ADSL exchanges by mid-2005 which, it claimed, will give broadband access to 99.6% of UK businesses and households. France T él écom's ADSL will reach 90% of businesses and households this year, according to IDC.

Across Western Europe, about 83% of consumers and businesses had access to broadband last year, and in the next two years or so that will rise to 90% to 95%, according to IDC's Bakkers. "In Western Europe, the role of WiMax will be limited," he said.

WiMax is expected to come fully into its own in areas where networks are not as fully built-out as in Western Europe and the US, such as Eastern Europe.

"Regardless of which vendor comes out on top, it is the millions of people in rural and developing markets who stand to gain the most from WiMax," said Pyramid Research analyst John Yunker.

Matthew Broersma writes for Techworld.com


Email Alerts

Register now to receive ComputerWeekly.com IT-related news, guides and more, delivered to your inbox.
By submitting you agree to receive email from TechTarget and its partners. If you reside outside of the United States, you consent to having your personal data transferred to and processed in the United States. Privacy

This was first published in April 2004

 

COMMENTS powered by Disqus  //  Commenting policy