Collaboration has been described as the next phase of
the internet. The need to respond quickly to market changes and the
proliferation of a geographically dispersed workforce are driving
organisations to prioritise workforce collaboration.
The adoption of Web 2.0 software tools, coupled with a continued
need to improve workforce productivity and the growing criticality
to capture institutional knowledge before it leaves the
organisation, is forcing organisations to make workforce
collaboration a priority and broaden its application across the
organisation.
The problem has been that in challenging economic times, making
the business case for collaboration at a time when the business
watchword has been efficiency and cost-cutting has been a
challenge.
Need for
collaboration
The past few months have necessarily seen a scaling down of
business plans for collaboration, as budgets have tightened. They
are still tight, but in challenging times, the need to collaborate
with people inside and outside the organisation is more important
than ever, both to maximise efficiency and to drive innovation.
The argument for not focusing on collaboration went, "There is
no time for collaboration now; doing more with less means we have
to hunker down. The return on investment of collaborative
initiatives is not always apparent, so collaboration is risky and
may lead to wasted resources."
Now, as we start - hesitantly - to consider the possibility of a
business recovery, the counter-argument says, "Collaboration will
help us do more with less and lead to new growth opportunities to
help companies differentiate themselves in difficult times, where
the mindset is 'work smarter, not harder', and where work is
something you do, not where you go. Collaborative tools can give
that business advantage, unlock organisation-wide and global
intellect, and use that to foster the joined up thinking that will
drive innovation."
Driving
innovation
Recent research undertaken by Computer Weekly as part of a
project with BT found that over 67% of respondents expect
collaboration to become an important driver of innovation over the
next 12 months. And they expect to have the budget for it: 83% have
sufficient budget to facilitate collaboration within the
organisation, and 80% say the collaborative technologies being used
have not been impacted by any budgetary changes affecting the wider
IT infrastructure.
In terms of the benefits collaboration brings to the
organisation, 93% of respondents said better communication, 83%
more effective staff, and 73% improved productivity. Faster
innovation was cited by 70%, and lower costs by a similar number.
In terms of how collaborative tools and techniques positively
benefit innovation, 23% said saving time, 20% said collaboration
enables the sharing of ideas, 17% said saving money or reducing
costs, and 17% said sharing information over a wider area.
The ongoing interest in collaboration was evident at a recent
CIO roundtable event on collaboration organised as part of the
Computer Weekly/BT project. Over 30 people turned up for a
discussion on the collaborative journey, as detailed in the box
below.
Take a reality
check
Most organisations interested in collaboration initiatives have
been doing their own collaboration reality check, asking these
questions:
- How far is collaboration really being exploited beyond some
pilot implementations?
- Who is taking the lead with this and in what areas?
- What big collaboration successes are there, and by whom and
what benefits were realised?
- Are companies really pushing this or "staying in touch" to see
how it fares?
- In the current market conditions, is there a justifiable return
for a big investment?
One of the key elements on the collaborative journey is the
importance of creating a collaborative culture. Collaboration is a
recursive process where two or more people or organisations work
together towards an intersection of common goals by sharing
knowledge, learning and building consensus. What collaboration does
not necessarily require is leadership, so it can sometimes bring
better results through decentralisation and egalitarianism. Teams
that work collaboratively can obtain greater resources, recognition
and reward when facing competition for finite resources.
What do we mean by collaborative tools? Typically, Web
2.0-inspired networking tools, such as wikis, Instant Messenger
(IM), Facebook or Facebook-like in-house portals, and developments
such as Twitter and Jabber. The use of such tools is accelerating
within companies - much of it under the radar of and against the
will of management - but preventing its use is likely to be
counter-productive. As workforces get younger, they expect such
tools to be available, and if they are not, they will either bring
them in, or go to work somewhere that is "connected" enough to use
them.
Knowledge
management
Around 10 years ago, managing information flows within and
between organisations was considered to be a strategic necessity.
The movement was labelled "knowledge management", but never really
took off.
Now knowledge management is a real driver for collaboration.
Take the example of Arup, the international construction and design
company involved with the development of London's "wobbly"
Millennium Bridge.
Virtual teams at Arup can collaborate across a global reach. But
that was not always the case. In fact, the lack of access to
knowledge within the organisation - while it was there - actually
led to the delays in solving the engineering problems that had
closed the bridge. Because the corporate memory could not be
shared, months of analysis and negative publicity followed, and the
bridge was closed until £5m of repairs could be completed.
Having learned the hard way about the need for knowledge
sharing, Arup now has a sophisticated knowledge discovery engine in
place to prevent such an occurrence again.
The collaborative
journey |
|---|
Business need Collaboration is a necessity in today's business environment. No
company can go it alone and collaboration and co-opetition extend
the range of ideas and input going into organisations' product
development. Drivers for collaboration - at various levels, and
both internal and external - can include a need to capture and
retain knowledge within the organisation, reduce the number of
meetings (or make them more effective), share input across
countries through wikis (making the most of time differences), or
improving communications through use of "presence", such as click
to call. |
| Where am I? The most basic form of collaboration is e-mail, which all
organisations are using but suffer the frustrations of. More
advanced organisations will already be using wikis, Instant
Messaging and blogs. Some may be using Twitter or some form of
corporate-branded Facebook-like application, such as MyBT, working
within the organisation (as an alternative to staff using Facebook
itself). Computer Weekly's research on collaboration found that the
most commonly used collaborative tools are Blackberries or other
smart phones, followed by videoconferencing, Instant Messaging,
presence and messaging software, Facebook and
Twitter. |
| How do you make a winning pitch? Assuming you want to step up collaboration, how can you sell
collaboration to your chief financial officer (CFO)? What return on
investment are you looking to achieve? Making a pitch for spending
on collaboration may not be an easy sell in today's challenging
business environment. It has been difficult to sell soft benefits
to a CFO who is in cost-cutting and business efficiency mode. But
rationalising voice contracts will help, and collaboration can now
be offered as a service, offering the benefit of known per-period
costs to the organisation. "Business cases in the current climate must be tactical, in tune
with the defined community of interest, and offer a shorter
pay-back period," says Neil Sutton, vice-president of global
propositions and product marketing at BT. |
| Managing the legacy Assuming you have the financial support of the CFO to start
exploring collaborative measures and implement a project, you will
need to start thinking about how to achieve it in your current
environment. How can you integrate collaboration within your
current environment? Or is collaboration as a service a
possibility? One of the problems cited with using collaboration
tools is integrating them with legacy systems. Although Web 2.0
tools are typically easy to use, legacy collaborative applications
can prove to be an integration challenge. "When you look at collaboration tools, integration is complex,
they are expensive, and the journey and roadmap is a long timeline
for most customers. That is why there is a strong case for offering
collaboration-as-a-service to help open up the organisation
knowledge silos," says Steve Masters, BT head of global unified
communications. |
| The chicken - or the egg? The final part of a journey towards effective collaboration
demands establishing and nurturing a collaborative culture within
the organisation. Do you have one? If you build it, will they use
it? E-mail has its drawbacks, but it is an accepted business tool
of industrial strength. People have good intentions in using new
tools such as wikis, but they will not - officially - take off
within the organisation without impetus. That may be peer-to-peer
driven, or it could come through an edict from the top. There may
be some resistance, so how do you go about creating a collaborative
culture? |
| |
The value of Web 2.0
What does this focus on collaboration really mean for IT
organisations, and how can they use it to harness global business
intellect and get value for the business using Web 2.0 tools?
The challenge is in deploying the very social tools heard about
and used at home within the cloistered, legacy world of the
enterprise: to get to market faster, drive cost out of the
business, and do it with agility, security and sustainability,
while remaining compliant. The good news is that everyone is still
on the starting line: there are few, if any exemplars.
Businesses are still hunting for answers and guidance, looking
to share ideas and best practice on how to meld business and
consumer collaborative tools together.
"It is clear that the momentum is gathering for collaboration.
With user and supplier organisations working together, and piloting
taking place, we are hopefully coming into one or two clear
applications on the business side similar to those in the consumer
side," says Ian Campbell, chairman of the Corporate IT Forum.
The difference between the move towards collaboration and other
step changes within IT is that the development of collaborative
technologies represents a social change phenomenon rather than a
technology change and, as one delegate at the roundtable pointed
out, "We are in for a long journey until we have reached a point
where business process and social cohesion come together on
this."
Case study: delivering
'presence' at Tayside Fire and Rescue
One of the key applications of collaboration delivered by
Instant Messaging is the concept of "presence" - the ability to
know when someone you want to contact is available and able to
connect in real time, using text, voice or video. It is not a term
known by all, however. In the Computer Weekly/BT Collaboration
survey, only 30% were able to explain presence as an enabler of
availability, while 40% were unfamiliar with the term.
A key user of presence within its operations is Tayside Fire and
Rescue in Scotland, whose area of responsibility covers 7,500
square miles, 24 locations and the safety of nearly 400,000
people.
Tayside, which is based in Dundee and Perth, relies on its
ability to know the up-to-date presence of its 800 staff, and to be
able to communicate with them instantly across the organisation,
providing voice calls, instant messaging, e-mail and streaming
video.
The fire service's needs for such a presence-driven application
are not limited to emergency requirements, but apply equally to
daily administrative tasks, such as contacting colleagues to
discuss operational or budgetary matters and for officers on
operational duty or in the community conducting training sessions
on preventive fire measures.
Tayside's adoption of a system based on Microsoft Office
Communications Server offers simple click-to-call, where the
identification of presence and preferred method of contact takes
the guesswork and trial and error out of communications.
Gary Bellfield, Tayside's manager of information and
communications technology, says effectiveness and efficiency are
key drivers of Tayside Fire and Rescue's adoption of unified
communications technology.
"Presence means I can see who is available, and click-to-call
just gets rid of all that latency involved with searching for a
number and hoping it is the right one. This system saves time.
Equally, if I am involved in a call and I have five or six people
waiting to contact me, I can receive an instant message, which I
can instantly respond to.
"The fire service is now tied into presence and availability. I
can see immediately if a colleague is on holiday, in a meeting, or
available to take a call, perhaps about business processes, line of
business applications or operational issues, and the means by which
they want to be contacted. This makes us much more efficient than
we have been in the past. If I am working in another location, I
would have previously had to use an alternative telephone
extension. With click-to-call, my number remains the same in
whichever of our 24 locations I might be working."
In addition to the collaborative benefits that have improved the
competency, effectiveness and mobility of its fire-fighters, and
the effectiveness of Tayside's communications, Bellfield has also
realised significant efficiency savings from Tayside's operating
budget of £27m.
Useful
links: