US lawmakers charged with overseeing homeland security have
voiced alarm at the continued vulnerability of federal computers to
attack by foreign parties.
Recent hacks into government networks that maintain sensitive
information, such as those alleged against the so-called
"NASA hacker" Gary McKinnon from north London, have sparked a
growing recognition that current US mandates are inadequate to
prompt improved security.
 |  |  |  |  | I believe they made the
determination that accessibility to data is more important than
confidentiality and integrity. Rep. James Langevin,
D-R.I., |
|  |  |  |  |  |
|  |
 |
"I believe the infiltration by foreign nationals of federal
government networks is one of the most critical issues confronting
our nation," Rep. James Langevin, said at a hearing of the
House Subcommittee on Emerging Threats, Cybersecurity, Science and
Technology . "Over time, the theft of critical information from
government servers could cost the United States our advantage over
our adversaries."
Of particular concern is the latest attack on government
computers to be disclosed officially—an infiltration of the
Department of State's networks in Washington and east Asia last
summer. In May 2006, a department employee opened a malicious email
that contained an attachment that installed a Trojan Horse, Donald
Reid, senior coordinator for Security Infrastructure at the State
Department's Bureau of Diplomatic Security, said at the hearing.
When officials discovered that data was being stolen, they cut off
Internet connectivity to the department's East Asia Pacific region.
Because Microsoft Corp. couldn't deploy a patch quickly, the State
Department implemented a temporary security fix for the
vulnerability. Microsoft released the patch in August.
Langevin, chairman of the subcommittee, took State to task for
implementing a temporary fix rather than taking the entire system
offline for a complete inspection while waiting for Microsoft to
release the patch.
"I believe they made the determination that accessibility to
data is more important than confidentiality and integrity,"
Langevin said.
Defending the agency's actions, Reid said officials felt "pretty
confident" that the recommended wrapper was the best course of
action, although it was a difficult decision.
"There's a business case here in terms of taking an entire
system offline," Reid said, noting that the visa application
process and other diplomatic services would come to a halt if the
system had been taken down. "We felt that the risks were worth it,
that we had a solution that was going to work."
Dave Jarrell, manager of the Critical Infrastructure Protection
Program at the Department of Commerce, testified that hackers using
a rootkit attacked the department's Bureau of Industry and Security
in October. Jarrell said he has no evidence to indicate any BIS
data was taken during the incident, but Langevin said he was
troubled that the department didn't know exactly when the
infiltration took place.
The network intrusions at State and Commerce follow years of
documented failure to comply with the Federal Information Security
Management Act (FISMA), which requires agencies to maintain a
complete inventory of network devices and systems. Government and
industry officials at the hearing acknowledged a disconnect between
FISMA's intent and effecting improved network security.
"The current system that provides letter grades seems to have no
connection to actual security," said Rep. Zoe Lofgren, D-Calif.
Some lawmakers are considering whether the Department of
Homeland Security should be given primary responsibility for
overseeing federal network security, but officials at DHS and
elsewhere suggested that wouldn't be the best idea. Noting that DHS
has not performed well on the annual FISMA report card and has not
implemented all of the recommendations put forth for improved
analysis and warning capabilities for attacks, Greg Wilshusen,
director of information security issues at the Government
Accountability Office, said it would be problematic from an
organizational standpoint to put DHS in the position of compelling
other agencies to comply.