Novell has joined the tumult surrounding Unix and Linux by
challenging the SCO Group prove its allegations that some of SCO's
Unix code has made its way into Linux illegally.In a letter on the Novell website from chief
executive officer and president Jack Messman, the company
challenged SCO's assertion that it owned the copyrights and patents
to Unix System V.
Novell, which had earlier acquired the Unix
systems business of AT&T, broke up and sold its Unix properties
in 1994 and 1995. One of those deals was with the former Santa Cruz
Operation, which was bought by Caldera International and later
became The SCO Group.
In his letter, Messman said the purchase
agreement entered into between Novell and SCO in 1995 did not
transfer the System V rights to SCO.
"To Novell's knowledge, the 1995 agreement
governing SCO's purchase of Unix from Novell does not convey to SCO
the associated copyrights," Messman wrote.
"We believe it unlikely that SCO can
demonstrate that it has any ownership interest whatsoever in those
copyrights. Apparently you share this view, since over the last few
months you have repeatedly asked Novell to transfer the copyrights
to SCO, requests that Novell has rejected."
Messman's letter also asked SCO to prove
immediately its assertion that certain Unix System V code has been
copied into Linux.
"SCO claims it has specific evidence
supporting its allegations against the Linux community," Messman's
letter said. "It is time to substantiate that claim, or recant the
sweeping and unsupported allegation made in your letter. Absent
such action, it will be apparent to all that SCO's true intent is
to sow fear, uncertainty and doubt about Linux in order to extort
payments from Linux distributors and users."
In a reply to Messman's letter, SCO stated,
"SCO owns the contract rights to the Unix operating system. SCO has
the contractual right to prevent improper donations of Unix code,
methods or concepts into Linux by any Unix vendor.
"SCO's lawsuit against IBM does not involve
patents or copyrights. SCO's complaint specifically alleges breach
of contract, and SCO intends to protect and enforce all of the
contracts that the company has with more than 6,000 licensees. We
formed SCOsource in January 2003 to enforce our Unix rights and we
intend to aggressively continue in this successful path of
operation."
The growing battle came to a head in March
when SCO sued IBM for $1bn, alleging that the company
misappropriated trade secrets related to SCO's Unix products to
benefit IBM's Linux strategy.
As for SCOsource, it was created to enforce
what SCO claimed was its position as the majority owner of Unix
intellectual property.
In another startling move, SCO sent out a
letter two weeks ago to nearly 1,500 global companies which use
Linux in their businesses, warning them that they should seek legal
advice because their use of Linux could leave them liable for
damages over SCO's pending intellectual property claims.
Messman's letter included an open letter to
SCO CEO and president Darl McBride, outlining Novell's announcement
last month that it is moving its product line to Linux and pointing
out Novell's commitment to Linux and the open-source development
community.
Messman said Novell was one of the companies
that received SCO's warning letter, which "compels a response from
Novell".
"In particular, the letter leaves certain
critical questions unanswered," Messman wrote.
"What specific code was copied from Unix
System V? Where can we find this code in Linux? Who copied this
code? Why does this alleged copying infringe SCO's intellectual
property? By failing to address these important questions, SCO has
failed to put us on meaningful notice of any allegedly infringing
Linux code, and thus has withheld from us the ability - and removed
any corresponding obligation - to address your allegation."
Messman wrote, "SCO continues to say that it
owns the Unix System V patents, yet it must know that it does not.
A simple review of US Patent Office records reveals that Novell
owns those patents."
Graham Bird, a spokesman for The Open Group,
which has owned the trademark for Unix on behalf of the Unix
industry since Novell transferred it in 1994, said SCO is wrong to
assert that it owns Unix. "What they own is some source code and
technology" for UnixWare, said Bird. "That's not the same thing as
owning Unix.
"If you're an uneducated observer of this, it
would be very easy to say that SCO owns Unix, which is not the
case," Bird said.
Bruce Perens, a key figure in the free
software and open-source communities and a critic of SCO's recent
actions, lauded Novell's move.
"Novell has answered the call of the
open-source community," Perens said. "Based on recent announcements
to support Linux with NetWare services and now this revelation ...
Novell has just won the hearts and minds of developers and
corporations alike."
Dan Kusnetzky, an analyst at market research
firm IDC, said the Novell letter widens the battleground. "This is
a set of intriguing developments that stands to only help one
company, and it's none of the companies that are participating
now."
The likely beneficiary would be Microsoft
because the legal squabbles could hurt the Linux market and turn
businesses against even thinking about additional Unix deployments,
Kusnetzky said.
Todd Weiss writes for Computerworld