You are here  IT Management Legislation and Regulation

Inspectors expose Lambeth outsourcing debacle

Chris Mugan
Monday 09 July 2001 05:32
A damning report from government inspectors has starkly exposed the problems of outsourcing failing local authority IT and business process services.

The Benefit Fraud Inspectorate (BFI) studied the impact of the decision by the London Borough of Lambeth to outsource its benefits and revenue service to Capita Business Services.

The report, delayed until after the general election, attacked most aspects of the service, which was outsourced in 1997 and taken back under Lambeth's control earlier this month.

Problems began with the contract specification: there were faults in the due diligence process and "Lambeth's longstanding backlog of work," got worse, according to BFI inspectors.

In 1999-2000, Lambeth assessed and paid 37,000 new claims - 16,000 fewer than in 1997-1998. This, however, only told part of the story. In a dramatic indication of the loss of management control, the council could not say how many claims were received.

The reduction in benefit recipients was partly due to a national decline in the number of people claiming, said Lambeth, but it also stemmed from problems in calculating the backlog and difficulties with the introduction, in January 2000, of a new IT system.

Lambeth said the changeover to an Academy system slowed the processing of new claims between November 1999 and March 2000. The BFI said this was because staff were not using Academy effectively.

Staff did not receive adequate training in the use of the system and were unsure how to access data that had been archived after conversion from the previous system, according to the BFI report.

Failure to use Academy efficiently meant Capita managers could not monitor staff and Lambeth could not monitor the terms of the contract.

"Not all correspondence has been recorded, so it is not possible to rely on the information recorded on the Academy system. Managers have not used IT reports to control the work in their sections and have created manual statistics to compensate," said the inspectors.

Lambeth was condemned for having an under-resourced contract management team, which led to poor performance monitoring.

The contract between Lambeth and Capita failed to specify the outputs required, the validation of data expected by the client or proper disaster recovery provision.

The BFI was also concerned that local authority had left itself in a vulnerable position because the IT system was owned by Capita, though the company was contracted to hand over the database if the contract was terminated early.

When Hackney council terminated its revenues and benefits contract with ITNet earlier this year it was left without an effective IT system for a month.

The BFI were particularly concerned about security. Investigators found valid user names for members of staff that had left Lambeth. Current employees had access to parts of the system they had no reason to use and Capita staff not working on the Lambeth site had inappropriate access to the system.

Following the inspectors' visit to the borough last September, Lambeth decided to end the seven-year contract with Capita and bring the 175 staff back in house, at a cost of £10m. Capita has been retained for IT support and for a call centre it runs in Coventry.

Lambeth welcomed the report as confirmation that it should take over management of its benefits service. Capita's group operations director Paddy Doyle said, "Capita is to hand back the administration of a much-improved housing benefits service to Lambeth whilst continuing to provide the council with key support services."