David BicknellSir Richard Branson's People's Lottery bid faces question marks
over its technology as well as its finances as the consortium tries
to satisfy the lottery regulator over its ability to take over from
Camelot.
Branson has been given a month to sort out the bid, but his
software partner Automated Wagering International (AWI) now faces
similar legal and technical issues as those that dogged the
incumbent operator Camelot and its technology partner GTech.
Ultimately, it was GTech's role in the National Lottery,
software glitches and the openness of its relationship with Camelot
which persuaded the National Lottery regulator Oflot to ditch
Camelot and provisionally opt for Branson's People's Lottery
venture.
Camelot has already sought to get the decision excluding it
overturned.
However, US reports say AWI has itself had problem in two US
states - Minnesota and Maryland -- in the delivery of new
software.
In Minnesota the state decided to call for competitive bids
instead of re-letting its lottery contract to the incumbent AWI
after a series of difficulties.
Maryland too has had problems; while Arizona is reported to have
cancelled a contract with AWI, saying it had failed to deliver what
it promised.
However, the UK Lottery Commission has insisted that it is
satisfied with AWI's technical abilities and AWI has defended its
own delivery record.
Although Camelot has been criticised over the financing of its
operation, there have been few serious technical glitches that have
disrupted the lottery's operation.
The People's Lottery has already indicated that it plans to
offer new lottery services to game players using devices, such as
mobile phones and PCs.
However, security experts have already warned that, while there
is a clear audit trail for the sale of lottery tickets, with
reasonable guarantees that participants are at least 16 years old,
any changes to allow the sale of tickets via PC or mobile phone
could mean systems are less secure.
If Branson's bid does get the green light to take over the
lottery, it would involve the widespread adoption of identity
guarantees, such as digital certificates, which are largely untried
and untested.