News

Users welcome prices for HP's 64-bit systems

Eric Doyle
IT departments have welcomed Hewlett-Packard's new price points for systems based on Intel's Itanium 2 processor.

Earlier this week, HP, which co-developed the chip, released two servers and two workstations with prices ranging from €4,500 (£2,900) to €23,000 (£14,800).

With prices well in line with expectations, Mark Hunt, global director for enterprise product marketing at Reuters, said, "Intel has an aggressive roadmap for future releases of Itanium which breeds confidence in the chip. We will need to do implementation tests in our datacentre but, if it proves attractive, we will definitely be looking to buy in the future."

Hunt believes the appearance of Itanium systems in customers' trading rooms, combined with broadband links becoming cheaper, will relieve Reuters of its reliance on cacheing at its datacentre to balance transmission speeds. "There has been a gap between the platforms and the architecture but the arrival of Itanium 2 brings the potential to offer more managed facilities with a full service delivery," he said.

Although HP is rushing into the Itanium market, other suppliers are not so keen. Dell Computer has stated that it is taking a wait-and-see approach to the nascent, low-cost 64-bit market.

HP took the wraps off its rx2600 dual-processor server and rx5670 four-way server on Monday. The servers, which can use either the 900MHz or 1GHz versions of the new chip, have price tags of about £4,500 and £14,800 respectively.

For the graphics and scientific workstation markets, the 900MHz single-processor zx2000 will cost about £2,900 and prices for the 1GHz zx6000, which can take one or two processors, will start at £4,900.

Email Alerts

Register now to receive ComputerWeekly.com IT-related news, guides and more, delivered to your inbox.
By submitting you agree to receive email from TechTarget and its partners. If you reside outside of the United States, you consent to having your personal data transferred to and processed in the United States. Privacy
 

COMMENTS powered by Disqus  //  Commenting policy