By submitting your personal information, you agree that TechTarget and its partners may contact you regarding relevant content, products and special offers.
Can you say in all honesty that every IT project you have steered has been an unqualified success? Most major implementations fail in one way or another and result in wastage of resources. IT project failures are costing the UK millions of pounds, according to analyst organisation Giga Group, and at least two-thirds is avoidable.
Because of the time and scale involved they are often out-dated by the time they are completed and fall foul of management churn. Companies should maximise the chances of success by planning more carefully, breaking down large projects into bite-size chunks and ensuring that there are lots of achievable short-term project milestones and early deliverables.
This at least was the consensus view of those attending a recent roundtable event, held at Brunel University, Middlesex, on finding ways to stem the "flood" of money and resources wasted on unsuccessful IT projects.
Much of the time the battle is lost before it has even begun, with companies failing to ask themselves basic questions such as what do we want to achieve and why are we doing this. According to Tony Morgan, independent consultant and visiting research fellow at Brunel University, there should be more of an onus on the business side to identify what it wants to achieve through the project before the IT department gets on board.
Failure to define strategic objectives, combined with poor communication, results in wasted time and effort through programmers coding the wrong things, says Morgan. He argues that if they were properly briefed you could eliminate 80% of the problems on the IT side. Automating more of the process and using a model-driven architecture can help avoid IT failures, he adds.
According to Simon Ratcliffe, a senior IT consultant at Business Systems Group, too many projects are borne from a misplaced desire to keep up with rival companies. "Pointless re-invention" results in projects going too far and getting rid of good process design as well as what is bad. "Companies need to be agile but not radical," he says. "After all, people aren't radical."
Mundane projects can deliver easy savings wins. Aiden Walsh, vice-president for IT at pharmaceutical firm Quintiles Europe, points to the huge value that projects involving the de-commissioning of legacy systems can provide.
Another common mistake is to underplay the human factor in a technological implementation. Paul Bevan, director of strategic marketing at Unisys, says companies often end up de-skilling their staff by installing "intelligent" technology when what they really need is intelligent staff using intelligent technology.
Mark Lycett, project leader of the fluid business research project at Brunel University, agrees, adding, "All too often business systems see people as technology slaves or process followers and not as problem solvers."
The need for IT and business to work closer together is a constant theme. Morgan stresses the need to create a common language so that the business and IT functions can understand each other. The present lack of communication creates a lot of scope for passing the buck, he says.
The IT department should also be more proactive and willing to assume the leadership role in IT projects instead of simply answering questions from the business side. "We need to have the courage to say that this is what we can do for the business," says Ratcliffe. "A lot of boards haven't got a clue."
Buying packaged software instead of developing your own can also help to reduce waste. Whilst Morgan says many companies simply opt for the off-the-shelf option because it is easy, Ratcliffe argues that most companies are more like their competitors than they think and so buying packaged software often makes sense. Walsh agrees, saying that this desire to do things yourself often ends up in a confusing, spaghetti-like mass of systems and interfaces. "We sometimes over-complicate things," admits Peter Crutchfield, head of IT at Marie Curie Cancer Research.
Projects go wrong for a whole myriad of reasons, but Lycett says managers should not be afraid to pull the plug on a project: it can show that you're moving with the times and can avoid further wastage. The important thing is to make sure that the reason for the failure isn't down to you.
The fact is that a lot of IT waste is avoidable and the potential for savings is enormous. With IT budgets under the spotlight and margins ever tighter, this is an area that cannot and must not be neglected.
Why do large projects fail?
- Too much needless re-inventing: if it isn't broke, don't fix it
- Projects initiated for the wrong reasons
- Business and IT not communicating
- Too many projects aimed solely at integration and don't really add value
- IT staff are afraid to ask questions.
How can you avoid waste in IT projects?
- Plan carefully: why are you doing this and what do you want to achieve?
- Break large projects down into smaller bite-size chunks
- Have internal milestones and early deliverables
- Don't be afraid to cancel projects
- Senior IT staff should take more of a leadership role in technology implementation projects
- Don't develop just for the sake of it: packaged software might do the job just as well
- Don't underestimate the importance of staff. /li>
Who was at the round table
Dr Mark Lycett , head of the fluid business research project at Brunel University
Spent 12 years working on feasibility and development projects before getting involved in research. A fluid business is defined as agile and integrates people, process and technology to enable it to respond to its changing environment with limited disruptions to its operations.
Tony Morgan, independent consultant and visiting research fellow at Brunel University
Author of Business Rules and Information Systems: aligning IT with business goals. Prior to his current role, Morgan was the senior solutions specialist at Unisys and headed up information system development projects in the UK, Europe and the US.
Simon Ratcliffe, senior IT consultant, Business Systems Group
Responsible for the planning and design of large infrastructure projects, including networks, systems design, messaging and workflow and specialises in designing and installing financial reporting systems.
Peter Crutchfield, head of IT, Marie Curie Cancer Research
Worked in service delivery, infrastructure and development and has been a lecturer in information systems. Prior to taking up his current role, he was responsible for a number of substantial IT projects in the City.
Aiden Walsh, vice-president of IT for contract pharmaceutical company Quintiles Europe
Responsible for the IT strategy and operations of Quintiles Europe. Previously he was vice-president for corporate IT at GlaxoSmithKline.
Paul Bevan, director of strategic marketing, Unisys
Held a variety of sales and marketing roles with Unisys since he joined the company in 1984.