A US judge has ruled that Advanced Micro Devices (AMD) is not entitled to trial documents that the company said might help it prove its European Commission antitrust complaint against Intel.
By submitting your email address, you agree to receive emails regarding relevant topic offers from TechTarget and its partners. You can withdraw your consent at any time. Contact TechTarget at 275 Grove Street, Newton, MA.
In a case that reached the US Supreme Court earlier this year, AMD attempted to force Intel to turn over confidential documents that were part of the discovery process in an antitrust trial between Intel and Intergraph.
Intel has resisted that request, saying that AMD was not part of any formal litigation with Intel and parties that merely filed complaints with foreign tribunals are not entitled to the same discovery as plaintiffs.
AMD originally asked the US District Court to rule on its request. That court denied AMD's request, but the US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit sided with AMD.
Intel then appealed to the Supreme Court, which ruled in a 7-1 decision that, while District Courts are entitled to provide discovery to parties like AMD in cases involving foreign tribunals, they are not required to do so. This returned the decision of whether or not to provide AMD with the discovery documents in the hands of the US District Court.
US District Court judge James Ware ruled that AMD's request was not valid because Intel is already a participant in the complaint and if the EC really wanted the documents in question, it could order Intel to produce them.
The EC filed a brief with the Supreme Court in support of Intel's position during that debate, telling the court it did not want the documents that AMD sought.
Furthermore, AMD did not make any references to the EC case or even any reference to Europe itself when filing its request for access to the discovery documents, Judge Ware wrote. This means that AMD's request was far too broad to be considered part of the complaint against Intel with the EC, which charged Intel was engaged in anticompetitive behaviour in Europe.
AMD has not decided whether it plans to appeal Judge Ware's ruling, said Mike Simonoff, an AMD spokesman. The company has 30 days in which to make a decision, he said.
Tom Krazit writes for IDG News Service