News

Debate over ICANN reform rages on

The debate about the reform of the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) continued at the Computers, Freedom and Privacy (CFP) conference in San Francisco on 18 April.

Nearly two months after the president of ICANN called for fundamental reform of the beleaguered organisation, ICANN watchers at the conference continued their high-volume debate over exactly what those reforms should be.

"There's broad consensus that ICANN hasn't worked. We need to ask: Do we need this beast?" said Jerry Berman, executive director of the Center for Democracy and Technology (CDT).

Although no one on CFP's ICANN panel suggested scrapping ICANN altogether, all agreed that radical reform is needed. The non-profit group, which oversees technical issues related to the Internet's addressing system, has been under fire almost since its inception for ineffectiveness and failing to take broad public input into account when making decisions.

ICANN president Stuart Lynn directly addressed concerns about the organisation last February when he called for a complete overhaul of the body. However, Lynn's proposal to bring more government participation and funding to ICANN and eliminate public representation on the board of directors has met with few supporters, leaving the question of how to effectively reform the organisation up in the air.

"I think ICANN has been hijacked from within... from its staff," said Susan Crawford, a partner with the Wilmer, Cutler & Pickering law firm, who has represented registries in the ICANN process.

Crawford suggested that ICANN subcontract some of its responsibilities and become a leaner organisation, therefore cutting out the need for heavy reliance on government funding.

"I am hopeful that a humbler, [chastened] ICANN will show up," Crawford said.

ICANN board member Karl Auerbach was not as optimistic.

Auerbach suggested a reform by which ICANN would be divided into six independent parts - three with governing policy duties and three with governing administrative duties - in order to provide more transparency.

However, Peter G Neumann, principal scientist with SRI International Computer Science Laboratory noted, there have been no complete proposals put on the table to counter Lynn's.

"What we desperately need is some fleshed out proposals," Neumann said.

Email Alerts

Register now to receive ComputerWeekly.com IT-related news, guides and more, delivered to your inbox.
By submitting you agree to receive email from TechTarget and its partners. If you reside outside of the United States, you consent to having your personal data transferred to and processed in the United States. Privacy
 

COMMENTS powered by Disqus  //  Commenting policy