As the risks of outsourcing become more apparent, IT leaders
find themselves in a strong position to lobby for influence in the
boardroom.
Delegates were bullish at IT's position at the centre of business
change and innovation in major organisations, at the recent annual
conference of senior IT users at the Corporate IT Forum
(Tif).
As a result, several major organisations that were represented at
the conference are now in-sourcing IT where they can, and are
advising extreme caution about any form of outsourcing.
Several themes emerged at the conference, which was attended
exclusively by senior IT directors and managers from some of the
largest UK organisations, which reassessed the traditional IT focus
on people, process and technology.
In contrast with supplier gatherings, the mood was confidently
buoyant.
Most attendees were involved in work such as web-enabling their
infrastructures and simplifying systems, while trying to better
align themselves with the business.
The boards of many organisations now accept the role of IT at the
heart of the business. "Our chief executive says that IT is a core
competency for Ford," said Richard Thwaite, Ford Europe's director
of IT. "For a company like Ford that is a major step."
A senior IT manager in a major retail organisation also stressed
the role of IT in innovation. "IT brings innovation to the
business," he said.
Another senior IT director of a public sector organisation agreed,
"IT is the engine of change, and an organisation will move forward
only with IT.
"The role of the chief information officer must be to put the
organisation in a position where it can take business opportunities
when they want to do so," he added.
That reasserted central role for IT explains why many companies,
for example Ford, are moving towards in-sourcing. One global
pharmaceutical company found that in-sourcing its VMS support cut
costs by 50%.
For those organisations who do outsource business functions,
several seasoned IT managers warned of the special skills needed to
manage these relationships.
"When you outsource you change your people's careers and ask
them to become consultants," said one.
"You can't influence them by pay, bonuses, reviews, you cannot
fire them, but you need to manage them. You cannot tell your
outsourcing partner how to run the business - you simply have to
trust them."
Advice on outsourcing included:
- Don't outsource everyone, keep enough people on-board to manage
the relationship
- Outsource commodity items
- Be sure to have an emergency escape plan when negotiating
- Be aware of the length of time lawyers take
- Take care to sort out intellectual property issues arising in
an outsourcing arrangement.
Several perennial issues were also batted around during the
conference, such as the relative merits of centralisation or
decentralisation. When it comes to the technology, and
architectural issues, the talk focused on simplification,
especially of e-mail systems and file servers and, as far as
possible, commoditisation.
Users called for simplicity in any business-related areas, such as,
business continuity. As one user put it, "Proper business impact
analysis needs to be simple and easy to implement."
The conference illustrated how users are thinking about
fundamentals such as customer orientation. "We must challenge
waffle, like 'being customer-focused'," said one IT director. "What
does that really mean? We're always under pressure to bring in
customer service, but cannot easily prioritise because you can
always justify something on customer service. It is more important
for IT to understand what capabilities are needed and what can be
secured and of value."
Another soundbite that is liberally used in IT was also challenged.
"The phrase 'people are our most important asset' is absurd," said
a senior user, "You cannot keep them all. The reality is that some
of our people are our most important assets."
And one user made a case for revisiting rejected ideas. "Every
company has had boardroom debates where ideas get rejected. We
should analyse out the component features of rejected ideas," he
said. "Today's daft idea is often tomorrow's brilliant idea."
Wrong reasons for outsourcing
- To reduce staff or take them out of the organisation - "no
success stories here to my knowledge", said one IT director
- To get rid of a management problem
- To solve a problem you are not able to solve
Beware outsourcing
- During mergers, acquisitions or disposals
- When there is a technology step change
- If the scope of the service is unclear (stop and work out what
you want)
- If you are in a hurry.
Think before investing in IT
- Will it enhance the customer experience?
- Will it increase the capability of your users?
- Will it contribute towards an agile infrastructure?
- Does it have common back-office systems and process?
What is Tif?
The Corporate IT Forum (Tif) is a subscription-based user group for
corporate IT users which runs workshops and benchmarking
activities. Members share experiences in a non-competitive
environment. Annual corporate subscription for large organisations
is £8,500, and its current chairman is Jonathan Mitchell, chief
information officer of Rolls-Royce.
About 170 senior IT users attended the conference, which was closed
to all press except Computer Weekly. Being an uninhibited user-only
environment, most speakers and participants were unwilling to be
quoted on the record.
www.tif.co.uk
Ford: Bringing back the IT people
"Although we have no big outsourcing deal, a lot of roles, such
as web hosting, are provided via outside agencies."
"IT people felt let down with outsourcing, and bringing them
in-house brings pride back into the organisation."
However, Thwaite is careful about who he brings inside. In a
gruelling day-long selection process, he is not looking first and
foremost on taking the best technical skills.
His first priority is to find people with the right values and
behaviours to fit in to the Ford culture, and then focus on
competencies.
"You can build competencies - that is a growing process - but
you can't change core integrity and instincts."
One highlight of the selection procedure is the in-tray
exercise, where the applicant has to demonstrate they can
prioritise through understanding the business issues as well as the
technical ones.
With about 30 electronic devices in each new car, and their
associated electronics costing 30% of the value of a vehicle, IT is
now recognised as core to Ford's business, said Richard Thwaite,
director of IT for Ford Europe.
Speaking to the Corporate IT Forum's annual conference, he said
that in-house people understand best how the business runs, so he
is working hard to recruit more software engineers.
His target is to raise the number of IT staff who are Ford
employees from 30% to about 60% .
The business challenges include reducing vehicle development
cycle time from 42 to 18 months through 3D geometry and computer
simulation; and cutting car order-to-delivery time from 80 to 15
days through web-led customer-centric sales and marketing
systems.
"It is unacceptable to have such IT outside the organisation, so
we have been bringing back in-house IT roles that have been
outsourced," he said.
"Although we have no big outsourcing deal, a lot of roles, such
as web hosting, are provided via outside agencies."
"IT people felt let down with outsourcing, and bringing them
in-house brings pride back into the organisation."
However, Thwaite is careful about who he brings inside. In a
gruelling day-long selection process, he is not looking first and
foremost on taking the best technical skills.
His first priority is to find people with the right values and
behaviours to fit in to the Ford culture, and then focus on
competencies.
"You can build competencies - that is a growing process - but
you can't change core integrity and instincts."
One highlight of the selection procedure is the in-tray
exercise, where the applicant has to demonstrate they can
prioritise through understanding the business issues as well as the
technical ones.