IT departments seem to have decided that, if outsourcing is not the
corporate cure-all neither is it an obsolete concept. Liz Warren
discovers that the strategy needs to be used judicially and that
every case is different.
The hype surrounding application service providers (ASPs) has
once again focused attention on the pros and cons of offloading IT
activities on to an external provider. The accumulated wisdom
gleaned over the past 30 years from one form of outsourcing or
another means there is now no excuse for getting it wrong.
David Thorpe, vice-president of global operations for outsourcer
EDS, says the golden rule for entering into a deal is that the
outsourcer should be able to do it better, cheaper or faster than
you can in-house.
If an outsourcer can meet these criteria, it is then possible to
outsource pretty much anything, says David Alexander, director of
strategy and marketing at services company Northgate Information
Solutions (formerly MDIS). However, he believes you should only
outsource things you are comfortable outsourcing, and he warns that
the one area you must retain control over is your strategy. "You
certainly can't get rid of responsibility for your strategy and how
the business uses your systems," he says.
If you want your outsourcing deal to be successful, you
definitely should not use it to sweep problems under the carpet,
warns Eileen Birge, research director at management consultancy
Concours. "Successful companies are good at establishing a baseline
of where they are today and understanding where the headaches are
occurring and why. They are then able to determine what is a
reasonable goal for them to achieve with an outsourcer," she
explains.
A key decision is to decide what form of outsourcing is right
for your company. Over the years, a number of models have been
developed. In many respects, the latest - the ASP approach - is
just a recasting of the earliest bureau services where clients
shared time on an expensive mainframe. The major difference in the
ASP model is that, rather than having to put up with a vanilla
implementation of the bureau's software, applications are now
configured to meet clients' needs. This allows more sophisticated
applications to be piped in.
With bureau companies building up expertise in datacentre
operations during the 1970s, the next step was the move to
facilities management in the 1980s. Typically, firms would hand
over day-to-day operation of their hardware but keep aspects such
as application management or user support in-house. The late 1980s
and early 1990s saw a move to total outsourcing deals, where
organisations handed over their entire IT departments to
outsourcers, often for upto 10 years.
Thorpe points out that this move was frequently driven by the
management philosophy of the early 1990s to concentrate on core
business. The same philosophy led to a boom in outsourcing of whole
business processes.
This "core business" philosophy has become somewhat discredited
as companies now recognise that information systems may actually be
a key competitive weapon in achieving business success. At the same
time, difficulties have cropped up in a number of total outsourcing
deals as they have matured, and this has also contributed to this
approach falling out of favour. For example, EDS launched a law
suit last year against one of its leading clients, Xerox, over a
contract clause. At the time it was signed, the 10-year, £2bn deal
had been hailed as a model development.
The basic problem, says Daryl Howe, director and founder of
independent outsourcing consultancy Quantum Plus, is that it is
naive to expect that one company can solve all your problems. "The
outsourcer just cannot be the best across the whole spectrum. Also,
the supplier and customer have different objectives, and you can't
just hand it all over and trust the supplier to look after all your
objectives," he says.
The perception that it is difficult to get good service across
all aspects of a total outsourcing deal and that you risk becoming
over-dependent on the supplier if you outsource everything have led
companies to become more selective about what they outsource and to
work with multiple partners, each specialising in a particular
area. The major drawback of this approach is that it increases the
management burden and costs on the client side.
All these traditional outsourcing contracts are based on service
level agreements (SLAs) that describe the rewards and penalties for
performance against clearly articulated targets. A more recent
trend is for partnership and equity arrangements, where the
outsourcer may take a stake in the client or where there is a much
stronger element of risk and reward on both sides. Here, the
outsourcer uses its expertise and initiative to help the client
drive its business forward.
However, John Cooper, European managing director of management
consultancy Concours, is cautious about strategic partnerships and
joint ventures between user organisations and IT companies. "The
user company doesn't want to lose complete control, but you have to
ask what it is doing running an outsourcing business," he says.
"Problems will be inevitable if the joint venture organisation
starts having business objectives which are not fully aligned with
those of the client organisation."
Following a more conventional tack, the latest development is
externalisation: contracting for managed services for systems that
have never been run in-house. The exponents of this approach are
dotcoms, but traditional firms are choosing to implement complex
new systems, such as enterprise resource planning applications,
through the ASP model.
This renewed interest in outsourcing might suggest that the
in-house IT department is doomed. However, there are a number of
roles which can never be taken away from the in-house team. These
include managing suppliers and monitoring service delivery,
advising the business on how developments in IT and the innovative
use of IT by others could be applied to develop the business, and
interpreting the needs of business managers for new systems and
then sourcing these systems, perhaps through new contracts with
external providers.
As a result, suggests Ian Leask, a consultant with benchmarking
specialist Compass Management Consulting, the IT department of the
future will no longer be full of technical specialists but stuffed
with commercial planners, business analysts and contract managers.
They will ensure the organisation gets what it wants from
outsourcing deals, rather than what outsourcers want to supply
because it would be better for their bottom lines.
Leask adds that such a team also has to act as a buffer between
the outsourcer and business managers, to ensure that any changes to
the contract to meet new business needs are implemented in a
controlled way. For example, they may want to ensure new systems
are based on standard technologies to prevent costs from
escalating.
However, Leask says this essentially commercial team will still
need both a technical background and a good understanding of their
company's business environment. For example, it should be able to
take an informed view on why four out of five companies in their
vertical sector are using a particular supplier's hardware and
decide whether it would be a valid approach for its own
company.
"The team does not need real in-depth technical knowledge, but
it does have to understand whether particular technologies can add
value to the business," Leask explains. "This will then allow team
members to discuss with the outsourcer how it should develop its
own infrastructure to support the client in the future."
In fact, the importance of retaining the right skills in-house
cannot be overemphasised. Research conducted by management
consultancy Concours found that poor supplier management was a
major factor in the failure of outsourcing deals, but
three-quarters of organisations did not recognise supplier
management as a skill, while almost all of them underestimated the
resources needed to monitor performance and adherence to
contracts.
Beyond that, Howe believes there is definitely a place for an
in-house technical team when it comes to delivering those elements
of the IT strategy that bring competitive advantage. He says
outsourcing should be reserved for established, routine processes
such as helpdesks, application support, legacy systems and payroll
and personnel.
"Where outsourcing struggles and where there is a role for the
in-house team is where there is a rapidly changing situation or one
that requires complex judgement of priorities. If you try to
outsource things that are evolving and non-routine, it can be hard
to determine SLAs, to measure performance and to price them," he
says.
However, trying to convince your business colleagues that they
still need an in-house IT team may not prove to be easy.
Next week, we look at some tactics to keep IT in-house and
profile a company that has brought its IT back in-house
Ingredients for a model outsourcing contract
- A comprehensive description of the inventory and personnel
resources being transferred, including any contracts with third
parties which may have a bearing on delivery of the
service
- A comprehensive description of the service to be delivered,
preferably in terms of output rather than input, and also in terms
of user perception of service rather than system
performance
- A clear description of the pricing structure, outlining what is
included in the standard fee and mechanisms for pricing variations
from the base contract, together with the option to go elsewhere
for new services if you don't like the price offered by the
incumbent
- Clearly documented remedies (financial penalties, additional
services) for non-performance, with termination clauses for serious
non-performance
- Clearly documented operational procedures for delivering the
service, monitoring it, escalating issues - including policy
development that needs to be resolved by the client - and resolving
disputes
- Clarification of the roles and responsibilities of all the
parties
- Clarification of which personnel will work on the contract and
agreements that supplier staff and employees who have transferred
from the client cannot be removed from the contract without the
client's agreement
- Provision for a honeymoon period for assumptions made in the
contract to be verified and mechanisms for the deal to be
renegotiated if invalid
- Procedures for amending the contract as the needs of the
business change, or as better technologies emerge, but only with
the agreement of the client, and for implementing those changes in
a controlled manner
- Exit clauses that allow the client to terminate in the event of
a major business upheaval, such as a merger, at a reasonable cost,
even if the service is satisfactory
Case study: Southern Pacific Mortgage links with
bureau/ASP
Southern Pacific Mortgage (SPML) did not want to be saddled with
the hassles of implementing systems or building up and managing an
IT team - and it wanted to avoid the up-front capital costs of
investing in IT.
A deal with the application service provider (ASP) arm of Lynx
Financial Systems gives it access to Lynx's workflow-based Summit
system, which manages its mortgage application process, while also
allowing it to offload the day-to-day wrangles of running
systems.
SPML is a mortgage lender specialising in "non-conforming"
mortgages for borrowers who are unable to obtain mortgages from
high-street banks or building societies. The company prides itself
on offering good service and fast turnaround to intermediaries that
package together the necessary documents on behalf of would-be
borrowers and submit them to SPML for a decision.
"We need a system to provide back-up, but we don't want the
development and running of that system to become a full-time job,"
explains Angela Davies, director of operations at SPML.
"Our skills are handling credit, and being able to make
decisions based on prudent lending policies, bearing in mind the
profile of our customers. We want our managers to be able to focus
on those core activities and to rely on experts to provide IT
services to us," she points out.
Since January, SPML has been using a system that is piped in to
its offices in Kensington, central London, over a leased line from
Lynx's datacentre in Bedfordshire. The deal with Lynx follows a
bureau arrangement with third-party mortgage administrator Home
Loan Management. The advantage of Lynx's ASP offering is that SPML
no longer has to put up with a standard, inflexible solution but
can tailor the Summit system to match its processes and business
methods.
Davies points out that SPML has service agreements with Lynx not
only for ongoing operations and helpdesk support but also for
application development.
"If we want to be innovative in our business and do something
different with the system, we can get those changes delivered
within an agreed timescale. We have the same control as if we had
an in-house IT department," she says.
Case study: Towry Law ventures into a strategic partnership
with CMG
Partnership is an overused word in the outsourcing industry. But
a strategic business partnership between leading independent
financial adviser (IFA) Towry Law and IT services group CMG appears
to be delivering benefits to both sides. Under the 10-year deal,
worth £17m, Towry Law has been able to pursue an aggressive growth
strategy, successfully identifying, acquiring and integrating five
companies in less than a year. It has also relocated the company's
offices while completely overhauling its systems from front to back
in the two years since the deal was signed.
"We certainly couldn't have achieved that without the kind of
relationship we have with CMG," says Keith Webb, Towry Law's chief
operating officer.
Established 40 years ago, by 1998 Towry Law employed 250 staff,
boasted a turnover of £18m and had a strong brand name. However, it
faced two major business challenges: the need to deal with enhanced
regulations imposed by industry regulators and the need to grow
both organically and through acquisitions. Both of these challenges
demanded investment in IT systems and infrastructure but, like
other medium-sized companies, Towry Law couldn't afford the
up-front investment costs.
From previous experience, Webb and his chief executive knew the
solution could lie in working with an outsourcing partner. Yet Webb
also wanted a depth of relationship that would give Towry Law a
degree of visibility and commitment at board level within the
outsourcer.
"We needed to identify a strategic partner whose business
objectives would mirror ours," he explains. That led Towry Law to
CMG, which had aspirations of its own to develop its business in
the IFA market, having acquired an IFA system. CMG needed an IFA to
work with it and act as its flagship. Towry Law could also help CMG
develop its management consultancy business by broadening its
contacts in major financial organisations beyond the IT department,
through introductions to the senior decision-makers in companies
whose financial products Towry Law distributes.
"If a financial product provider wants us to act as a
distributor for its products, it will have to work with CMG as our
technical partner," Webb explains. So the continued success of the
deal advances the business strategies of both parties.
In practical terms, the outsourcing deal covers three
elements:
- CMG works with Towry Law to develop its information services
strategy, under the supervision of the Towry Law board. To ensure
this strategy remains in Towry Law's best interests, part of CMG's
remuneration depends on the strategy releasing cash benefits and
contributing to Towry Law's long-term success
- CMG is then responsible for the administration and management
of the change programme within Towry Law and delivering solutions
to meet that strategy, including solutions from CMG's
rivals
- Finally, ongoing operation of those solutions is handled by
CMG's processing team. Webb points out that the integration of
these latter two elements means that if a system does not function
correctly once it has been rolled out, the blame lies firmly with
CMG.
While disputes between the two companies have so far been rare,
there is a clear escalation path for serious issues which cannot be
resolved easily. It requires CMG to bring in an independent team at
its own expense to report to the Towry Law board. Towry Law has
also created another safeguard against the risk that CMG might
exploit its favoured position.
"Solely at my discretion, I can instruct one of an agreed
shortlist of companies - which are not direct competitors of CMG -
to review the entire relationship in terms of pricing and
activity," Webb explains. "Should they report that CMG has done
anything which is detrimental to our ability to compete, CMG will
be in breach of the contract."
Is outsourcing the hero or villain of IT departments?
David Alexander
Director of strategy and marketing, Northgate Information
Solutions
"Outsourcing should be a hero because it should free the
in-house team to concentrate on value-adding activities and provide
staff transferred to the outsourcer with a better career path,
since they are now working for an organisation specialising in
IT."
Ian Leask
Managing consultant, Compass Management Consulting
"In some situations, outsourcing can be exactly the right thing
to do but there are other situations where you shouldn't outsource.
For instance, you should never think you can get rid of a problem
by outsourcing, because all you will do is make it bigger."
Tony Shaw
Director of network and information systems management,
University of Paisley
"Selective outsourcing can help reduce the stress on IT staff,
broaden their career options by allowing them to apply their
technical knowledge to managing suppliers rather than doing the job
themselves, and help focus them back on to the core business
requirements of their organisation."
Keith Webb
Chief operating officer, Towry Law
"If outsourcing is used effectively, it can be the hero in that
it can enable the company to deliver its commercial strategy. It's
a villain if you try to use it for pure cost reduction, because no
outsourcing deal results in absolute cost reduction in the
long-term - and you will pay for it later."
Tips for successful outsourcing
DO:
- Think about how long you want the agreement to last: longer
deals will be cheaper but you will lose flexibility
- Group services together logically when selectively outsourcing,
and avoid creating areas where different outsourcers have joint
responsibility
- Develop an in-house team with the right skills and enough
resources to manage your outsourcing supplier
- Recognise that your requirements will change, so develop
procedures for renegotiation of service level agreements and
implementing changes
- Include the people who will manage the contract on a day-to-day
basis in contract negotiations, to minimise the risk of committing
to something unrealistic
- Raise potential service issues early, before they become
critical
DON'T:
- Outsource a mess or problem area
- Skimp on the resources required during the transition period
and on an ongoing basis to manage the contract
- Keep staff in the dark about the deal and what will happen to
them
- Allow the boundaries of the contract to creep - make sure the
contract scope is tightly defined
- Allow purchasing specialists involved in contract negotiations
to push you into a cost-reduction deal at the expense of original
objectives such as improved service levels
Case study:University of Paisley picks selective
outsourcing
A detailed cost/benefit analysis was the impetus for the
University of Paisley to outsource management of its campus
networks to communications solutions provider Milgo Solutions.
Milgo is now responsible for four Nortel-based networks supporting
10,000 students and 1,000 staff. As well as providing considerable
cost savings, the three-year, £150,000, deal will relieve pressure
on busy staff, eliminate the hassles of recruiting and retaining
network skills and should help the university raise its standard of
service.
The deal with Milgo is part of a deliberate policy at the
university to selectively outsource suitable activities to
commercial partners. Working with external partners in this way is
unusual in the higher education sector.
Tony Shaw, Paisley University's director of network and
information systems management, ascribes this willingness to work
with commercial partners to the commercial background of many of
the IT staff at Paisley. He says this leads them to recognise that
external partners can provide a more effective or efficient service
in some areas.
However, Shaw is wary of outsourcing everything. "With desktop
services, users in higher education are frequently arguing for
variations from the norm. It's very hard to tie the desktop down to
a core set of products. Consequently, desktop services would be
difficult to outsource." He also feels that outsourcing selectively
through a series of relatively small contracts, which can be
defined accurately, minimises the risks associated with managing
outsourcing deals. Finally, he points out, outsourcing contracts
places a heavy demand on senior staff and outsourcing selectively
reduces that workload to manageable chunks.
When creating the network management contract, Shaw bundled
together a range of elements that formed a logical unit and that
could be defined easily. These included network maintenance,
installation and configuration management and remote support. But
from the outset he intended to implement these services
incrementally and he was open to suggestions from the outsourcer as
to how operations might become even more effective.
"A primary objective was to find a supplier who could help us
develop the network through best practice, including the
intelligent use of network statistics. Milgo's remote management
facilities and existing customer base convinced us they could," he
says.
Prior to the Milgo deal, the university had already agreed an
outsourcing contract with Telewest for its wide area network. This
deal is successful but, Shaw admits, it has taught him a great deal
about how to outsource. He is now looking for an Internet service
provider to provide round-the-clock support for student e-mail and
remote dial-in access services.