Government introduces new rules to prevent tax-avoidance

The government has introduced new rules intended to prevent companies from minimising their UK tax bills, amid several IT companies having been singled out as alleged tax-avoiders.

The government has introduced new rules intended to prevent companies from minimising their UK tax bills.

The rules will come into effect on 1 April 2013, are outlined in draft guidance published for consultation by the government.

Under the changes potential suppliers will have to notify contracting departments of their recent tax compliance history, and tell the department of any incorrect tax has been filed; or of any failed avoidance schemes.

Suppliers will also be required to disclose if they have been convicted for tax related offences or have been subject to a penalty for civil fraud or evasion. Departments will be able to disqualify any bidder meeting these criteria from the procurement process.

Chief secretary to the Treasury, Danny Alexander, said: "The government is clear that aggressive tax avoidance is totally unacceptable. That’s why we are closing loopholes, bringing in a new General Anti-Abuse rule, and investing hundreds of millions of pounds in additional funding to help HMRC clamp down. These new rules are another significant tool as they will enable Government departments to say no to firms bidding for Government contracts where they have been involved in failed tax avoidance.”

There has been criticism of IT suppliers, including Capgemini and Accenture, and allegations that they aggressively minimise their tax bills. But suppliers claim they pay their tax as specified in the taxation rules.

Accenture, for example, denies that it is doing anything to aggressively avoid tax.

"Accenture reports all of its revenues earned within the UK and pays taxes on the profits earned within the UK. We take our responsibilities as a UK taxpayer seriously and pay tax on our UK profits as required by UK laws. Not only does our tax structure comply with UK tax law, but we take a conservative view of the tax law. We are confident that our tax filings are compliant, transparent and appropriate," said an Accenture spokesman.

Computer Weekly  disclosed that CSC paid just 0.5% tax on £1.5bn income earned from a 10-year outsourcing deal with Royal Mail signed in 2003.

Read more on Managed services and hosting services

Join the conversation


Send me notifications when other members comment.

Please create a username to comment.

Banks, governments and juristiction are no longer welcome in my Kingdom. These archaic social structures needn't superseed the 5th Domain any longer;


My ex partner and father of our two small children earns £8,750 a month working in in the city for a large insurance company. He claims to earn £750 per month, the rest the company pay as a "beneficial loan" or a "numeration trust fund". It's a tax avoidance scheme and can be found on the HRMC website if you put "beneficial loan" in the search. This mean he pays NO tax and therefore only pays £2 per day per child in maintenance for his two children. He and his new partner live with her children and can claim Child tax and working tax credits. His True income is £500 per day as a contractor. How's that for BS, and the CSA say they can't do anything about it and that "it's all too common in the city". Time to blow the whistle on this immoral but legal tax loophole that the Government won't touch.


these rules are very good and helpful to avoid Tax Lien for others.