The pensions administration system that the government proposes should manage the retirement savings of millions of people could not be run more cheaply by the public sector than the private sector, according to consultancy firm Oxera.
Oxera investigated how much it would cost the government to provide people with personal accounts for their pension contributions and how much it would cost the insurance companies.
The research, which was commissioned by the Association of British Insurers, estimated the initial IT investment and the running costs for both options.
It said, “The information available to analyse large pension systems does not provide evidence to support the existence of economies of scale beyond a certain point, which is 500,000 accounts.”
Oxera looked at UK pension providers’ administration costs, including the IT systems that they have built over years, and concluded that there are limited economies of scale. It said other studies confirmed that large systems stop generating economies of scale past a certain level.
The suppliers running a government-managed personal accounts system would have less incentive to innovate their systems than a group of insurers because the contracts would be long term, the report concluded.
Read more on IT jobs and recruitment
DWP hit with £87.9m tax bill by HMRC over 'historic' IR35 status contractor assessment errors
IR35 reforms: Loan charge and employers’ NI issues prompt calls for legislative revamp
Industry questions viability of Labour plan to offer free full-fibre broadband to all UK homes
UK labour market could be harmed by private sector roll-out of IR35 reforms, consultancy warns