Microsoft judge throws out five consumer cases


Microsoft judge throws out five consumer cases

A US judge has dismissed five consumer complaints filed on behalf of consumers who alleged that Microsoft's monopoly power in the desktop operating system market forced them to pay too much for Windows.

Judge Frederick Motz threw out the complaints, citing guidance from recent decisions by appeals courts in the relevant states that prevent "actions brought by indirect purchasers of licences to Microsoft software". Consumers typically buy Windows from indirect resellers such as retail stores.

Antitrust law regarding consumer liability varies from state to state, however. Motz' decision comes after a $1.1bn (£670m) settlement earlier this month in an antitrust suit that called for Microsoft to offer vouchers, ranging in amount from $4 (£2.40) to $29 (£17.60), to California customers of Microsoft software.

Microsoft's legal problems related to private antitrust cases are far from over. Motz recently granted an injunction on behalf of Sun Microsystems, requiring Microsoft to offer Sun's Java to users purchasing Windows.

Microsoft is appealing the decision, but whether or not an appeal is granted, it still faces a court battle in Sun's suit, as well as cases brought by Be, AOL Time Warner and

Other consumer cases in various states are pending.

Email Alerts

Register now to receive IT-related news, guides and more, delivered to your inbox.
By submitting your personal information, you agree to receive emails regarding relevant products and special offers from TechTarget and its partners. You also agree that your personal information may be transferred and processed in the United States, and that you have read and agree to the Terms of Use and the Privacy Policy.

COMMENTS powered by Disqus  //  Commenting policy