So – HP has just announced it is acquiring Aruba Networks; basically the 2nd-3rd stab at buying a wireless solution after Colubris and effectively inheriting additional WLAN tech with the 3Com acquisition (that NOT being the raison d’etre for that acquisition).
By submitting your personal information, you agree that TechTarget and its partners may contact you regarding relevant content, products and special offers.
The daft thing here is that, after doing some internal test comparison work for HP towards the end of 2009, the recommendation was – “definitely cheaper and quicker to acquire Aruba than incorporate that capability into your own technology”.
So x 2, of course, they didn’t – and then went and acquired Colubris, on the basis of wanting an Enterprise WLAN solution (AKA Aruba) except Colubris had been designed as a hospitality/hotel etc type solution. The question is, how much would Aruba have cost in 2009 – $3bn? More to the point here, Aruba these days has many OEM deals in place (but not back then) with key HP rivals, most notably Dell boys. So, what happens there? And we thought Putin was going to be at the heart of WW III…
On the plus side, this HAS to be a better acquisition than Autonomy -)
As a footnote – HP (as Procurve’s) original WLAN portfolio was based on licensing a subset of Symbol’s WLAN product range, a company that Motorola acquired a few years ago. So why not simply acquire Symbol before Motorola did, and then add Aruba back in 2009? But then, what do I know about comparing products and best acquisition practise?