Captives go back a long time. Big businesses have been setting up operations to carry out business processes in low cost regions since the 1980s.
By submitting your personal information, you agree that TechTarget and its partners may contact you regarding relevant content, products and special offers.
Like offshoring work to an overseas supplier it is a way to cut costs but unlike offshoring work to an oversea supplier it is a way of retaining ownership of everything.
Apparently after a slowdown in setting up captives during the recession there is growth again. According to figures from Nasscom, quoted in the Economic Times, India, there were over 70 new Indian captives set up by multi-nationals in 2012 and 11 existing ones expanded.
Despite these figures describing the large number of captives being set up in India Professor ILan Oshri at Loughborough Business School believes it is Eastern Europe where most the activity is.
He says this is because of the hidden costs associated with Indian captives. These include extra costs caused by high staff attrition and travel expenses.
Mark Lewis an outsourcing lawyer at Berwin Leighton Painsner, says there is also a trend towards setting up captives onshore. US and UK companies are setting up centres in lower cost regions of their home territory. He says he is working with a large UK organization that is planning to set up a centre in the North of England near a university. This is to take advantage of lower skilled labour at a competitive cost.
He says this is because of regulations that are starting to look at captives and the risks associated with them. For example financial services regulators are looking closely at operational risk and captives might be seen as being risky.
The recent case of the UBS rogue trader is a good example. The rogue trades should have been spotted by a captive centre in Hyderabad, India. But a mistake by a worker meant the fraud which cost the bank £1.4bn went unnoticed.
An increase in captives is a threat to the big Indian IT services suppliers because it takes work away from them. You don’t need to hire an Indian supplier to take advantage of skills and competitive prices when you have you own set up. But the setting up of captives onshore or in Eastern Europe could threaten the entire Indian IT sector, not just the suppliers.
Eastern Europe is already seen as a good alternative to longer haul regions and there has been recent talk of US firms rural sourcing, which is the practice of having work done in low cost onshore places.