Let’s save us all some time. After this year’s A-level results, please read what we wrote about at the same time last year, and the year before – and, frankly, probably every year for at least the last five years.
By submitting your email address, you agree to receive emails regarding relevant topic offers from TechTarget and its partners. You can withdraw your consent at any time. Contact TechTarget at 275 Grove Street, Newton, MA.
We can easily regurgitate the same headlines: “Number of students taking IT-related exams falls again.” We could almost use the same words in every story, just change the numbers slightly.
It’s beyond a joke really, but the truth is that ICT and computing GCSE and A-levels are little more than a joke these days. Just 297 girls sat the computing A-level, for example. What’s the point?
The curriculum for ICT and computing is so poorly perceived that IT employers pay it no attention. Hardly any companies look for new recruits with those qualifications – maths, sciences, even languages are more likely to get you a job in IT.
The government has at least finally recognised that the GCSE curriculum is a waste of time, and education secretary Michael Gove duly scrapped it earlier this year – but hasn’t replaced it, leaving a vacuum in its place that will likely see students numbers drop even further.
So should we bother at all with IT education in schools? Why not just look for students who have done well in the basic science, maths or engineering topics and leave the IT training to employers?
Well, if IT employers still funded sufficient training, maybe we could. But lack of training remains one of the biggest skills issues facing the IT profession.
We are genuinely fed up of having to write the same story every year. Each time, the same commentators and experts bemoan the lack of progress, but nothing changes. We all know what needs to be done – IT employers need more outreach into schools; the IT profession needs to promote better role models to attract kids to study with the aim of a career in IT; the curriculum needs to reflect the digital skills we will need in 10 years, not those we had 10 years ago.
But it’s hard to have any confidence whatsoever that it’s going to happen soon. Perhaps this demographic timebomb will need to explode before anything happens – but by then it may be too late.
At the very least, let’s do one thing now – recognise that the current exams at all levels are a waste of time, and scrap them. Perhaps that, at least, will spur employers, academics and politicians to make the radical changes that IT education needs.