Despite the $25bn buyback, which will enable Dell Computers to restructure its business while avoiding the scrutiny of shareholders, Michael Dell remains committed to the PC business.
By submitting your email address, you agree to receive emails regarding relevant topic offers from TechTarget and its partners. You can withdraw your consent at any time. Contact TechTarget at 275 Grove Street, Newton, MA.
But where will the company go next now that it is private?
Founder and CEO Michael Dell has fought a public battle with activist billionaire investor, Carl Icahn, over his plans to buy back the computer company. Icahn supported shareholders who were unhappy with Dell’s initial offer to buyback the company for $24.4 bn. Icahn pulled out of the fight on September 9th.
Supported by Silver Lake Partners, Dell has successfully bought back the company. Significantly, Microsoft invested $2bn in Dell’s buyback bid, which may point to one the reasons the Dell is still planning to grow its PC business.
Experts Computer Weekly spoke to gave a mixed reaction to the company’s plans.
During the call to investors, Dell was at pains to emphasise the PC business, according to Gartner research director Adrian O’Connell. “Dell may have felt the need to articulate this part of the business. PCs and peripherals still represent half of its revenue, but in terms of growth potential, the PC market is constrained.”
Read more about Dell
- Carl Icahn and Southeastern join forces in fight over Dell
- Dell board seeks alternative to founder’s $24bn offer
- Dell confirms private plans
- Dell sacrifices share value to smooth private bid
- Dell is going to get his company back
- HP warns Dell customers over buy-back fallout
- Dell business transformation: Is the CIO the glue or change agent?
- Dell sacrifices share value to smooth private bid
From Gartner’s perspective, there are not big gaps in Dell’s product portfolio, but O’Connell says the company faces broader business issues. “Are enough prospects aware of what Dell can do in providing solutions at the heart of their data centres? Is the sales force skilled enough?”
He says this is probably the reason the company emphasised a focus on the channel during the investor call. “You can have the best technology, but the business needs to be aligned behind it. We often overlook the mechanics of the business. This is fundamental – and it is the biggest thing Dell needs to get right.”
In a new blog post on the buy-back Lionel Lamy, associate vice president European services research at IDC, said that Dell needs to move past its traditional "hardware-first" approach to focus primarily on customers and their fast-changing requirements. “Doing this should enable Dell to be focus less on the short-term financial market requirements and in the longer term become stronger competitor to HP and IBM within the enterprise IT infrastructure and services space,” he wrote.
During the battle to buy back the company Dell presented documents highlighting the difficulties the PC industry now faces. But the company appears to remain focused on end-user computing, which some experts believe is a flawed decsion. “Microsoft is trying to protect the Windows ecosystem and Dell is very close to Microsoft and Intel,” says Tom Reuner, principal analyst at Ovum .
But going private is unlikely to help it return to its former glory as the leading PC maker. Reuner does not expect that the buyback will help Dell rebuild its PC infrastructure business given the decline in PC sales and the rise of Lenovo as a strong competitor. “Dell has not branched out quick enough to make in-roads into adjacent services. We have seen many acquisitions but not enough to overcome the erosion in the PC market.”
Lenovo is the only company growing in the PC market thanks to manufacturing in a low cost economy and the key advantage of access to Chinese market.
Reuner expects Dell will face many difficulties deriving value in the PC market. It has no software ecosystem, so will be unable to develop an Apple-like experience, where Dell can maintain tight control over the software and the hardware. “Dell is still a manufacturing company. I can’t see how it can build a value chain,” Reuner adds.
He expects Dell to make more investment in services.
But having spent $25bn buying back the company, funding future acquisitions is going to be hard, according to Brenon Daly, a research director 451 Group. In a blog post on the Seeking Alpha investor site, he said: “Altogether, it has spent more than $12bn to get into new markets, including storage (EqualLogic, Compellent), services (Perot Systems), networking (Force10) and security (SonicWALL, SecureWorks). It's also relevant to note that shareholders footed the bill for that shopping spree.”
Dell is likely to come under increased pressured to continue doing what it has always done, making and selling PCs. But the popularity of tablets shows the market has shifted. PC refresh cycles are now four to five years, while tablets are being replaced far quicker.
When Computer Weekly spoke to Dell’s US head of services, Kevin Jones, he highlighted Clerity and Make, the company’s recent acquisitions in the mainframe market. Both Clerity and Make provide legacy modernisation tools.
Dell appears to have most of the products it needs to match IBM and HP in the enterprise market, but lacks credibility. Its go to market strategy will be key, but this is not something that will happen overnight, or over a few financial quarters. The privatisation will buy Dell time to reengineer the company.