Oracle's attempted takeover of PeopleSoft would enhance competition, not harm it, the company argued in its response to the US Department of Justice's (DOJ) antitrust lawsuit seeking to block the merger.
By submitting your email address, you agree to receive emails regarding relevant topic offers from TechTarget and its partners. You can withdraw your consent at any time. Contact TechTarget at 275 Grove Street, Newton, MA.
The takeover would allow Oracle to compete better with SAP, the market leader in human resource management (HRM) and financial management services (FMS) software, Oracle's lawyers argued.
The merger would also help Oracle compete with Microsoft, which is "aggressively expanding its position in enterprise applications software".
The DOJ's view that Oracle, PeopleSoft and SAP are the only suppliers which meet the needs of the large enterprise market for HRM and FMS software is "illogical and wrong".
Other software suppliers produce HRM and FMS packages used by companies of varying sizes, including enterprises, Oracle argued.
The DOJ has failed to define a particular market that would be harmed by the merger, and the DOJ is drawing a distinction between enterprises and smaller businesses to give the impression of a small number of suppliers of what the DOJ calls "high-function" HRM and FMS software.
A merged Oracle and PeopleSoft would have about 14% of total revenues for HR and payroll software licences and maintenance.
The DOJ has argued that a merger between Oracle and PeopleSoft would drive up prices for HRM and FMS software because Oracle would have little incentive to give large customers discounts.
The merger would give the new company little incentive to innovate and create new products, the DOJ argued in its lawsuit filed in February.
Grant Gross writes for IDG News Service