eevl - Fotolia

BT refunds £129m public funding on reaching broadband targets

Public funds will be re-invested in extending government-backed programme to deliver superfast broadband to 95% of the UK by 2017

BT is to pay back £129m of the money it received from local authorities to roll out superfast broadband, as a result of exceeding targets for take-up of the services. The cash will be returned to councils for re-investment into further roll-out of fibre-based connectivity.

BT won most of the £1.7bn funds provided by the government to install superfast broadband into areas previously considered not commercially viable, as part of a programme to reach 95% of the population by the end of 2017. As part of BT’s contracts with councils, there was a “claw-back” clause specifying that BT would pay back some of the cash when adoption of the publicly funded roll-out exceeded 20%.

BT reached the targets ahead of expectations, and said it has revised its business case to reach 30% take-up instead, meaning it can return some of the funds it received.

“It's fantastic to see that the roll-out of superfast broadband is delivering for customers and for the taxpayer. The government was clear from the start that, as levels of people taking up superfast broadband went beyond our expectations in areas where we invested public money, BT would re-imburse the taxpayer for re-investing into further coverage across the UK. This now means that BT will be providing up to £129m cashback for some of the most hard to reach areas,” said John Whittingdale, secretary of state for culture, media and sport.

More than 2.5 million additional premises across the UK now have access to superfast broadband as a result of the government funding, which was channelled through its BDUK agency. The figure is expected to reach three million premises by August 2015. BT's fibre-based broadband network now covers about 80% of the country, making superfast services available to 23 million premises. Some 20% of those premises have so far installed high-speed broadband.

“We’ve hit our original take-up assumption and have rolled out ahead of target and on budget. This is a real success story for the UK,” said BT CEO Gavin Patterson.

“We are delighted to be able to share that success by making up to £129m available to extend the roll-out to more BDUK homes and businesses, earlier than planned and at no extra cost to the taxpayer.”

Rural broadband criticism

BT said it will work with councils to identify where the claw-back funds can be invested to increase fibre-based coverage sooner than would previously have been the case.

A recent assessment by the Department for Culture, Media and Sport showed that BDUK has so far spent £352,718,218 – which equates to 6,837 premises for each million pounds spent. Local authorities have to match the BDUK funding for their area to be eligible for the programme.

In January 2015, the Public Accounts Committee (PAC) criticised BDUK for not being vigilant enough in delivering its own superfast broadband coverage targets. The MPs found there were still pockets in rural areas without broadband; and that surveys found only 16% of rural small and medium sized businesses (SMEs) have access to superfast broadband, while half are not satisfied with the service they have.

The PAC previously criticised BDUK for awarding all its contracts to BT, and attacked BT for a lack of transparency about the details of its roll-out, following claims from smaller, rural broadband providers over unfair competition.

However, the most advanced of BT’s council-backed projects – in Cornwall – recently hit its 95% coverage target and estimated that superfast broadband had brought more than £186m of economic benefit to the region.

This week, MPs on the Culture, Media and Sport Committee launched an inquiry into delivering superfast broadband to the final 5% of UK premises that will not be included in the existing BDUK and BT plans for rolling out higher-speed connectivity.

Read more about BDUK's broadband programme

 

Read more on Telecoms networks and broadband communications

Join the conversation

2 comments

Send me notifications when other members comment.

Please create a username to comment.

Hmm. Maybe if it had done the job properly it would have spent more. Our village now has superfast in name only. Yes we can order it but the actual performance of it is worse than what we already have with ADSL (1.6Mbps vs the current 5Mbps).
Cancel
As someone living in the 5% twilight zone, for this and previous broadband improvements, I'm still not holding my breath. At least fibre is offering a longer term solution so with a good uptake rate and in theory a longer useful lifespan to pay back investment, there is a better case for tackling as much of the remaining copper network as soon as possible. I suspect however that some money will end up going into additional 4G coverage and this is partly a ploy to put pressure on councils to approve new masts which for businesses does not address the 5% broadband gap.
Cancel

-ADS BY GOOGLE

SearchCIO

SearchSecurity

SearchNetworking

SearchDataCenter

SearchDataManagement

Close