d1revolver - Fotolia

UK bank customers set to share DNA data with banks for biometric authentication

UK consumers want to use biometric authentication security for banking and are willing to share DNA data with institutions for identification purposes

Two-thirds of UK consumers regard biometric technology as more secure than usernames and passwords for banking, and a quarter are ready to share data about their DNA for identification purposes.

Biometric authentication could change the perception that making things easier to use makes them less secure and financial services companies need to invest in the technology or risk losing customers, according to a report from communications supplier Telstra.

As more people use mobile banking apps with the promise of instant services at your fingerprints, they don’t want to constantly type in usernames and passwords. Small touchscreens can make it particularly difficult on the move.

Telstra found that, in the UK, two-thirds of consumers believe identification technologies such as voice, fingerprint, iris and facial recognition are more secure than passwords and would help reduce the risks of fraud. A total of 32% of UK survey respondents said they had experienced identity theft either directly or indirectly, compared to the global average of 38%.

Two-fifths (40%) of respondents from around the world who had experienced identity theft said it was mostly or entirely the fault of the business holding their details. Almost two-thirds (63%) of respondents said they would change supplier, such as their bank, if they experienced identity theft directly; and 54% said they would change if they indirectly experienced it.

Users lose faith in passwords

“For the last six months, we’ve spoken to consumers and banks all over the world, in an effort to understand how our relationship with our smartphone is affecting our relationship with our financial institutions,” said Rocky Scopelliti, global industry executive for banking, finance & insurance at Telstra. 

“What we uncovered is that, when it comes to mobile banking applications, consumers no longer believe in just the safety of passwords and usernames. 

Read more about financial transaction authentication

“In fact, one in four UK consumers would even consider sharing their DNA with their financial institution, if it meant it would make authentication easier and their financial and personal information more secure.”

Banks are investing in biometric technologies in response to this type of attitude, particularly among younger age groups. Research from Visa Europe found 75% of 16 to 24-year-olds said they would have no problem using biometric security, with 69% expecting it to be faster and easier than a password or a Pin. Research in 2014 from Intelligent Environments found 52% of consumers want banks to integrate fingerprint scanners into digital banking apps. This was the most popular, followed by iris scanners (33%), facial recognition (30%), electrocardiogram heartbeat monitors (29%) and voice verification (27%).

In September 2014 Barclays announced plans to launch biometric readers for customer authentication. The technology has been developed with Hitachi's Finger Vein Authentication Technology, also known as VeinID.

Halifax is testing a technology that identifies customers by their heartbeats, to allow them access to banking services. Alibaba has demonstrated an app that will allow mobile shoppers to use selfies as authentication when making payments.

 

 

 

CW+

Features

Enjoy the benefits of CW+ membership, learn more and join.

Read more on IT for financial services

Join the conversation

2 comments

Send me notifications when other members comment.

By submitting you agree to receive email from TechTarget and its partners. If you reside outside of the United States, you consent to having your personal data transferred to and processed in the United States. Privacy

Please create a username to comment.

The next frontier. Or the last one reimagined for the next generation of security. Either way, this is surely the way security is bound to go.

With every new data breach, it grows more apparent that our current system of passwords is past its prime. While they still work, they're no longer worth the effort to jot them down.

Biometrics seems to be the answer to security for now and it should be good until cloning become common practice. But what other secrets will be revealed by our DNA? And who might keep and use that data? For what purpose?

No one needs advertising tailored to their genome, but I doubt it will be far behind the launch of this new technology.
Cancel
these reporters are lying their butts off, hoping you will believe them and let down your guard and buy into the mark system as a safer way. it is an utter lie, in fact it is less secure. anyone will access to there server can change your info at will. this new system does one thing only, it removes your ability to fight back, they now own you lock, stock, and barrel. resist as long as you can, even til death. your soul never dies, keep ownership in your hands and offer it up to the most high. he loves you and he owns everything including you. he wants to be an equal partner in your life...
Cancel

-ADS BY GOOGLE

SearchCIO

SearchSecurity

SearchNetworking

SearchDataCenter

SearchDataManagement

Close