Your shout: Green IT, virtualisation and security anarchy

Readers' views on the week's news



The road to green IT should not stop half way

Adam Hitchmough, Chiltern IT

I was incredibly disappointed to read John Hardy's letter "Toxic hardware is just a drop in green IT bucket" (Computer Weekly, 30 January). I was apparently under the naïve belief that everyone was supportive of green IT and helping the environment.

I do applaud his company's efforts to be green, but why stop half way? Or is it that the home working and laptop provisions fit in with the business, but as soon any actual effort is required it all becomes too much like hard work?

For months Computer Weekly has been supporting the green IT campaign, but this view implies that the efforts have been wasted. It is absurdly irresponsible to have this view after all, if everyone took Hardy's stance, the green IT bucket to which he refers would surely overflow.

Messaging is not instant way to save the planet

Chris Greaves, Ipswitch

I was amused to read about consultancy BWCS' notion that instant messaging is saving the planet, (Downtime, 30 January). While I welcome any solution that helps to reduce the UK industry's carbon footprint, I think it is probably a stretch too far to suggest that instant messaging could reduce carbon emissions by as much as 14.2 billion pounds.

The assumption that 25% of all UK office workers will cease to commute to work in the next three years as networking technologies improves is a big one.

Corporate instant messaging can be a great tool that allows staff to communicate in real time, regardless of their location. However, it is not the knight in shining armour eco warrior riding to save the environment from CO2 emissions as suggested by BWCS.

SMEs should not be alarmed at licence to bill

William Old, Inrucan

Contrary to the story "Microsoft targets SMEs in blitz on illegal software" (Computer Weekly, 6 February), the Business Software Alliance (BSA) cannot fine anyone - it has no judicial or quasi-judicial authority whatsoever. It might try to pursue civil remedies in the courts on behalf of Microsoft, but in England and Wales, any recovery proceedings up to the value of £5,000 would be via the small claims track, and so it would not be able to recover any of its legal costs in such cases.

There is no need for SMEs to complete or return the "survey". If you are happy with your licensing position, bin it if it arrives.

By the way, yes, we use Linux.

Desktop virtualisation can also yield benefits

Jon Rolls, ScriptLogic

Arif Mohamed's article on virtualisation (Computer Weekly, 6 February) was a very interesting read, however, I could not help but notice that desktop virtualisation was not covered.

Just as server virtualisation is about consolidation of server hardware resources, the aim of desktop virtualisation is to consolidate desktop hardware and software and reduce PC complexity.

We have seen flavours of this already with thin client technology and virtualisation software for workstations. In addition to the management benefits, there are other advantages, including data security, high availability and easier provisioning of offshore systems.

However, not all desktops can be replaced with virtual ones, so although desktop virtualisation can yield cost savings, there will always be a mixture of virtual and non-virtual desktops in the enterprise.

IT security anarchy is just adding to the problem

Earnie Kramer, Lightspeed Systems Europe

In response to your article "Standalone security will vanish in three years" (Computer Weekly, 13 February), I completely agree that it is no longer enough to take an outside-in approach to security by building a fortress around data.

Breaches and incidents continue to increase, despite escalating year-on-year spend on security products, and as organisations create a highly complex infrastructure of point security systems, they are in danger of losing control. To be frank, most security installations in place today are an accident waiting to happen.

Much of the blame can be laid at the door of the IT security industry and its vaunted multi-layered strategy. Adding systems in response to every emerging threat is not reducing the risk it is simply creating an anarchic environment that offers nothing more than an opportunity to sell more products.

It is only by monitoring network activity that you can develop the security controls - and solutions - that truly reflect business risk.

Answer back

Do you have a fresh take on someone's opinion on this page, or something to say about a Computer Weekly article? E-mail [email protected]. Please include a daytime phone number.

Read more on Operating systems software