Hitachi comments on EMC patent allegations


Hitachi comments on EMC patent allegations

Hitachi has strongly refuted claims made by EMC that it is infringing on six EMC patents, countering that the US-based company simply can't compete head-to-head with its electronics rival.

Last Friday (12 April), EMC filed suit in the US District Court for the District of Massachusetts in Massachusetts, seeking damages for copyright infringement and requesting in a separate complaint that the International Trade Commission (ITC) block Hitachi from importing the infringing products into the US.

The Tokyo company believes EMC's allegations are without merit and will vigorously defend its products, Hitachi said.

EMC claims that its patents covering the company's SRDF (Symmetrix Remote Data Facility) business continuity software and its TimeFinder remote storage software have been violated due to Hitachi's use of the technology in its HORC (Hitachi Open Remote Copy) and HOARC (Hitachi Open Asynchronous Remote Copy) products. The patents at issue in the suit are 6,101,497; 6,108,748; 6,092,066; 5,909,692; 5,742,792 and 5,544,347.

As the owner of more than 1,200 US patents relating to data storage, Hitachi has respected the "legitimate" intellectual property of others and has done so in respect to EMC, Hitachi said.

EMC's actions only hinder fair competition in the market and harm the interests of consumers, Hitachi said.

According to EMC, it was forced to file the suit after four years of negations with Hitachi failed to settle the matter. The ITC has until mid-May to decide if it will proceed with the case.

Email Alerts

Register now to receive IT-related news, guides and more, delivered to your inbox.
By submitting your personal information, you agree to receive emails regarding relevant products and special offers from TechTarget and its partners. You also agree that your personal information may be transferred and processed in the United States, and that you have read and agree to the Terms of Use and the Privacy Policy.

COMMENTS powered by Disqus  //  Commenting policy