Recently in Music Category

Apple to Start Streaming from iTunes?

| | Comments (0) | TrackBacks (0)

Fans of both Spotify and the Mac were quick to put two and two together, and come up with six billion four hundred and three when Apple announced they'd acquired music site Lala.com on Friday.  Lala, an online hybrid of Spotify and last.fm functionality is an unusual acquisition for the iPhone makers. The untutored eye might think of it as merely a web-site.  But it's more than that. It's a tried and tested music streaming technology, wrapped in a bundle of ready made label deals and a revenue model ready to go. 

Unlike Spotify, they're not reliant on pushing ads. There are free tracks available when you sign up for the site but, after the first 25 gratis tunes, any "web song" in their catalogue can be bought and streamed forever from Lala for a paltry 10 cents. 

So, lets do the required mathematical calculations.  Lala is an online, pay to stream music service. iTunes is a download store accessed by Apple client software, available on OS X and Windows, and compatible with the iPod and iPhone. It already has Webkit browsing capability built in - the rendering engine behind Safari. That's how in connects to and displays the iTunes Store.  Ipso facto, QED, it won't be too much of a cut and shut job to weld Lala onto iTunes and - voila - Spotify-ish streaming with the Apple name behind it.

Another innovative feature Spotify can't match: Lala can scan your existing library of digital tunage and make it available online, using their "Music Mover" application.  Coinky-dinkily, the current layout looks looks very much like it might be iTunes poor and trashily dressed cousin.

Of course, Lala's going to need some work first, both on the UI design (which is appalling) and the library of licenses (which Apple has a great deal of experience dealing with).  But, and this but is as big a but as J-lo's, Lala is currently US only. Try to sign up for the site in Blighty and you'll be told to politely go home and make some tea and crumpets.

Meanwhile, though Spotify continues to go great guns in Europe, it's yet to become available in the USA - where they still think it's cool to buy CDs. 

What does this mean for Apple? It has a golden opportunity to steam in and slurp up demand for streaming in the Americas while Spotify are still trying to untie the knots.

In fact, so starved of free, streaming music are our Stateside brethren, that they've started buying vinyl again.  The New York Times reports a resurgence in demand for old plastic discs and turntables.  It's not just the warmer sound this generation of record buyers love - it's the 12" sleeves, graphics and liner notes; the tactile sensation of holding a real object that accompanies the music.  There are some special sensations that gadgets just can't replace. Yet.

Spotify, meanwhile, have been handed their gum shield and given the bell for round one.  They may have Europe sewn up for now - but it's imperative they capitalise on that strong start, sort out US licensing pronto and convert their massive freeloading fanbase into paying users. If not, they could  end up as the Netscape of the streaming music market.  

In the meantime, here's some video of a nice lady explaining the benefits of Lala.com:


Mini MIDI: Korg's Nano Controller range

| | Comments (0) | TrackBacks (0)

I am that ubiquitous thing: a tech journalist with a secret past as a part-time musician.  I know it doesn't sound like a natural match but - believe me - we are legion.  It's always nice when my twin obsessions (gadgets and noise) come together.  I've just been checking out Korg's NanoSERIES range of USB MIDI-controllers.  These things are very cool. And very weird.

To explain.... MIDI is the protocol for translating musical notes into bit and bytes.  That includes routines for volume, tone, key pressure and so on. Budget MIDI-controllers are rarely very exciting - little plastic keyboards or USB mixers with lots of knobs.  Boring. Functional.

Then along comes the Korg Nano range.  Taking a more designery (I'm assured by Google that this is now a word) approach to gadget fashioning, they're three neat looking, strange little USB units with different MIDI control functions. The nanoKEY is a slick mini-keyboard, with chunky keys for porky fingers like mine.  Smaller than a laptop QWERTY, it'll easily fit on your desk, we suspect. Then there's the nanoKONTROL - a similar board with lots of knobs. If you've ever tried using a music recording program you'll know there are an interminable number of volume, balance, equaliser, level, send, effects and (fill in the blank here) controls.  With this, you can assign software controls to nine real live twisty knobs and sliders and eighteen switches. Not enough control for you?  Add another one. Or a third. Brilliant.  A just released new plug-in for Apple's GarageBand makes it even more useful.

That just leaves our favourite: the NanoPAD.  It's a similarly sized deck with a dozen sensitive pads that you can tap, smack or hit with a drumstick. Instant drumkit, just add a laptop. And some software.

All the Nano range are under £50 - with the nanoKEY available for £39.  When mine arrives, I'll give you a more in-depth overview. 

Here's Korg's offical video, Check out the chap rocking out at the bus stop...


Review: Spotify for Android

| | Comments (1) | TrackBacks (0)

Thumbnail image for spotify-android-playlist2-large.jpg

Spotify for Android. Please note: these are not my playlists... Robbie Williams. Bleurgh.


I love Spotify.  No one has paid me to say this.  Well, technically, someone has.  Someone will pay me for this entry - but I am free to say "Spotify is as rancid as an old plum that's been stored for ten years in a tramp's boot" if I want.  But I don't want, because I love Spotify.

The famous streaming music app has completely changed the way I access and listen to music. And I do listen to music a lot.  From Vivaldi to Vampire Weekend and every stop in between.  Except Keane.  No one likes Keane.

While my collection has been partially digital since I picked up my first iPod from New York's Apple shop in 2003, there have still been CDs.  Not anymore though. Spotify just made them redundant.

Of course, there are some notable artists you won't find on Spotify yet. There's no Pink Floyd or Peter Gabriel. There's little Husker Du. The problem isn't that those artists haven't agreed to appear - it's that deals have yet to be brokered with their labels.

But there's still plenty to love about Spotify.  An easy to use interface that isn't a slave to iTunes, support for Boolean searching, shared and collaborative playlists and streaming music that's of perfectly listenable 160Kbps quality. 

And, loving Spotify as I did, I thought the company had shot itself in the foot.  Its revenue model is based on two prongs.  The first; advertising interrupts your listening pleasure if you use the free version.  And, we have to admit, the advertising can be pretty annoying.  Especially when your carefully composed playlist of 70s German electro is interrupted by Robbie Williams honking out his new single. The second; you can trade up to Premium for £9.99 a month - or £119.88 a year. 

A tenner a month sounds a bit steep - but if you're a real music fan, it's equivalent to a CD every 30 days or 10 tracks a month on iTunes.  Still, I was wondering - what true incentive is there to go Premium when Spotify's already giving you so much for free?  And then I tried Spotify for Android. 

Now I get it.

Spotify's mobile applications - Spotify for Android and Spotify for iPhone are beautifully designed music player apps in a mobile world overpopulated with appalling, thrown together twitch and flick interfaces.  Realising that screen real estate is at a premium, Spotify for Android packs all its functionality into four simple tabs in understated Spotify charcoal and green; Playlists, Search, Playback and Home.  The search page is actually better than in the desktop version of the app - enabling you to choose between title, artist or album with the click of a tab. And instead of flipping through a stack of bitmap thumbnails to find music, it's all available in easy to navigate lists.  Goodbye, pretty but user-unfriendly cover-flow. Goodbye forever.

The mobile app is free to download - but there's an apparent catch.  You need to be a Spotify Premium user.  After a few days carrying Spotify for Android around on an HTC Hero though, we're failing to see the problem.  With unlimited data - bundled with many mobile contract packages these days - Spotify turns your handset into a digital music player with almost limitless capacity.  And, if 3G bandwidth is a problem, it's easy to download playlists for offline listening.  You just click "Offline Playlists" and tick which ones you want to back up when you've got a WiFi connection. You can store up to 3333 tracks, which is, more than enough for a couple of week's holiday off grid.

I've read other reviews of the mobile versions of Spotify and there's one thing they don't make clear enough.  Spotify for Android doesn't cost £9.99 a month as some insinuate - it's free with Spotify Premium.  You get Spotify Premium on your desktop and on your mobile for the same price.  That means no more adverts, 320kbps resolution, and offline listening on both your mobile phone and desktop computers.  Who needs to actually buy music anymore? If you're Spotify savvy - not you.

Google Music Search is here! Sort of.

| | Comments (0) | TrackBacks (0)
The Official Google Blog has announced Google Music Search, in a clear attempt to grab some of the online audio pie that iTunes and Spotify are so gleefully scoffing.  Early, snarky rumours about the service linked Google with iLike - Facebook's default music application. With only a handful of tracks available from each artist in its vast catalogue of commercial and unsigned bands, the iLike service has always seemed more like a promotional app than a useful music finding tool - and the prevailing commentary reflected that.

Recently though, iLike was snapped up by MySpace. The once hip social network is putting the brakes on its credibility haemorrhage by refocussing on music - and succeeding.  Other Google Music Search partners include Pandora, the US-only, proto-Spotify music streaming site, and big industry names Sony, EMI, Universal and Warner Bros. Apple and Spotify are absent from the register so far.

The service sees direct links to streaming songs appear at the top of your Google searches for favourite artists.  And even the ones you don't like. In other cases, you'll get a link to buy and download a track or three.  It'll return results for song titles too, or even that one line you can remember from the lyrics. Unfortunately, typing "What's that song that goes de doo, de doo, de doo doo?" isn't quite as effective*.

We'd love to be testing Google Music Search right now but, as ever, it's rolling out across the US first.  This isn't a surprise given the metric gigatonne of industry honchos that will need wining and dining to clear up all the required copyright and licensing issues.  In the meantime, Google have kindly made a video showing how it will all work. Eventually.




* The answer, of course, is "Yellow" by Coldplay.



 

Subscribe to this blog

Archives

 

OpenID accepted here Learn more about OpenID

 

Follow Computer Weekly on Twitter