ID Cards £6bn benefits spin

When an IT scheme costs too much to declare openly, officials sometimes present to Parliament the partial costs only.

So when an MP asked for the costs of the Defence Information Infrastructure he was told £2.3bn. He was not told that this estimate was the first phase only. The scheme in fact was projected to cost £7bn, which Parliament discovered only years later.

Similarly the NHS IT scheme was announced as costing £2.3bn in 2002. Internally, the Department of Health had costed the scheme at £5bn but kept the evidence of the estimate hidden. Now it’s due to cost at least £12.7bn.

With ID Cards it’s a bit different. When the virtuosos of spin want to make the costs of a project seem small they tend to express the costs as annual amounts or over a period of say three years.

When they want to make the financial benefits of a scheme seem large, they gather in a heap the savings over a long period of say 10 years.

The Home Office has gone way beyond this in a report which it has published today.

The Home Secretary Jacqui Smith, the Home Office and the Identity and Passport Office have expressed the benefits of ID Cards over 30 years.

A week is a long time in politics. How many of today’s MPs will be alive in 2039, let alone remember a promise made by a Home Office minister in 2009?

For the record here’s the claim made in the Home Office’s press release of today, 6 May 2009:

“An impact assessment of the National Identity Scheme published today estimates an economic benefit of up to £6bn over the next 30 years.”

Professor Ross Anderson, Professor of Security Engineering at Cambridge University’s Computer Laboratory, said the government’s estimates today on the costs of ID Cards have been underestimated “by an order of magnitude”.

PS: Jacqui Smith is to lose her job as Home Secretary within weeks, says today’s Sun. This puts the 30-year promise into context.


ID Cards to roll-out “within months” – a problem for the Tories?

Join the conversation


Send me notifications when other members comment.

Please create a username to comment.

With the best will in the world, a professor of security engineering is hardly best placed to comment on the costs of a series of contracts for business functions and identity tokens. Now, you might not agree with the Government on ID card costs, but you have to admit they at least regularly publish what are their best estimates. Where's Professor Anderson's analysis? Apart from quacking on about a four year old LSE report (prepared by people who were opposed to ID cards and so hardly likely to be impartial) where's his evidence?

Someone knowledgeable about security is critical to the discussion, since a substantial proportion of the costs of a proper system will come from that. You know that government systems have often been hacked and contaminated by virus, including in the UK.

And you are presuming he knows nothing about other subjects, when in reality some academics do know much and some don't.

The writer should refer directly to the reports quoted in this article. The writer does give two links, one to the professor's web site which has links to some of his work, and one to another article Why don't you go find the other reports and give us the URL? [edited]