Differences could not be bridged
Caroline Davis & David Bicknell
When US Appeals Judge Richard Posner, who had been mediating between Microsoft, a string of US states and the Department of Justice, finally threw in the towel last Saturday, the last obstacle to the Microsoft judgment was removed.
After Posner admitted that the differences between the Government and the company were "too deep-seated to be bridged", both sides declared that they had gone the extra mile. Unfortunately, neither had come anywhere near completing the course.
Instead, to Posner's clear annoyance, a flood of leaks were made from both sides.
Microsoft needed to demonstrate that it would accept an agreement as an alternative to tying up its lawyers for years. In the end, it chose to pay their bills right up to the Supreme Court.
Microsoft is guilty of predatory behaviour
Microsoft maintained its monopoly power by anti-competitive means
Microsoft unlawfully tied its Web browser to its operating system in an attempt to monopolise the Web browser market
Microsoft prevented Netscape's Navigator browser and Sun's Java environment fulfilling their potential to open the market for Intel-based PC operating systems
Microsoft's marketing arrangements did not constitute unlawful exclusive dealing
Register now to receive ComputerWeekly.com IT-related news, guides and more, delivered to your inbox.