Energy usage is a focus for many at the
moment. For IT, it seems to be a big focus - mainly as organisations
become more aware of how much energy is wasted in their data centre
facilities. However, it is likely to be brought into even greater focus
in the not so far distant future, as the looming energy deficit starts to
become more apparent.
A mix of short-sightedness and prevarication
by politicians means that the UK is now at a position where it is unlikely that
it will be able to meet all its consumers' energy needs in just a few years -
the UK's energy market overseer, Ofgem predicts that the UK's current energy
generation over-capacity of 14% could fall to 4% in just 3 years. The
failure, or the need to take down for even planned maintenance - of only one
generation plant could lead to insufficient power being available for all the
country's needs.
Therefore, planned outages will be required to
be put in place - and the biggest energy users will be targeted where overall
country needs will not be adversely impacted.
So - steel and aluminium production is
unlikely to be hit. Retail may be asked to cut down on lighting and
heating. But the one place where politicians can really point to is the use
of IT - and how many organisations could be asked to reduce their energy usage
here - or risk having it cut off for periods of time.
It is widely accepted that data centres are
inefficient when it comes to usage of energy - the average utilisation of a
server is around 10-20% of cpu, and of storage around 30%. Sure - a move
to virtualisation can drive up these utilisation rates and so lower the amount
of equipment being used and so lower the energy being needed - but is this the
best way to address the overall need?
To take a bigger picture, it is necessary to
look at the whole data centre facility and its energy usage. There is a
means of gaining a measure of the overall energy efficiency of a facility
through the use of power usage effectiveness, PUE. This is a comparison
of the total amount of energy used by a facility divided by the amount that is
used to power the IT workloads - i.e. that used by servers, storage and network
equipment. The rest of the energy is used in peripheral areas, such as lighting,
cooling, and uninterruptable power supplies (UPSs).
A theoretical perfect data centre should
therefore have a PUE of 1 - all the energy is used in powering IT
workloads. However, in practice, the PUE for an "average"
facility is around 2.0 - for each Watt of power used for IT workloads, another
Watt is used for peripheral items.
So - only 50% of the facility's total energy
is reaching the servers, storage and networking equipment. Running at 20%
IT equipment utilisation means that at a rough estimate, around 90% of a
facility's total energy input is essentially going to waste. Upping IT
equipment utilisation rates to 40% and getting rid of excess equipment could
mean a saving 10% of a data centre's energy usage - which is wonderful - but still
only means that 20% of a data centre's energy is being used for useful IT work.
However, the majority of data centres utilise
UPSs to support pretty much all the energy used across the facility.
Unfortunately, many of these devices are pretty old, and will be running at 94%
efficiency or less. Modern UPSs run at 98% efficiency or greater.
But, is a 4% improvement in energy efficiency at a UPS worth the bother when a
10% improvement at the server and storage layers is possible?
Back to the maths. If all the facility's
energy goes through the UPS, then a 4% improvement across all systems (servers,
storage, networking, cooling, lighting) is a 4% savings in energy bill -
without having changed anything but the UPS. Now, introduce the
virtualisation mentioned above. The server utilisation rates are upped
from 20% to 40% as before, and the saving is 10% of the data centre's energy
bill. But, because we have improved the overall data centre's energy
usage as well, we get a greater saving. Every time we improve the
equipment in the data centre - IT or support - then we gain that extra energy
efficiency as well.
Modern UPSs also provide a host of other
capabilities - as battery technology and battery management systems have
improved, a well-implemented UPS can help in bridging some breaks in energy
provision without the need for auxiliary generators to switch in. They
can also better deal with low voltage situations ("brown outs"),
ensuring that an optimised energy feed gets to all equipment.
Should Ofgem be right, there will be planned
brown outs and power cuts around the country within a few years.
Organisations can help in many ways - improving their data centres so that they
are more energy efficient could put this back by a few months. However, ensuring
that their data centre facilities have newer, more effective UPSs in place can
help in not only providing a far more energy efficient facility, but also in
dealing with the problems that an energy deficit could present.
Quocirca has written a report on the subject, which can be downloaded for free here: http://quocirca.com/reports/773/powering-the-data-centre


Leave a comment