Government to review summary care records rollout, says Pulse

| 2 Comments
| More

Pulse reports today that the Government is to review the Summary Care Record rollout. It says the review was a surprise announcement at the Local Medical Committees' conference in London.

The announcement may have pre-empted strong criticisms by GPs of the coalition government for announcing last week that it was continuing the summary care records scheme - apparently without a review.

The Chairman of the British Medical Association's GPs Committee Dr Laurence Buckman told the conference today that the health minister Simon Burns has sent a letter saying that he is to hold a review following GP concern over the Summary Care Records rollout.


The Government's review will cover the possibility of a change to an opt-in model of consent and also the entire content of the record, amid concern over security.

This blog has revealed that a report from the University of London will say that there are inaccuracies and omissions in some of the summary care records uploaded so far. The final UCL report is expected to be published next week. 

In his letter Burns said the Government accepted the need for electronic records but not in their current form.

Pulse quotes Burns as saying: 'We believe that the current processes that are in place need reviewing to ensure that both the information that patients receive and the process by which they opt out are as clear as possible.'

At the LMC conference GPs stopped short of calling for the Summary Care Record to be abandoned altogether, with 50% voting against in favour of 43% who backed the abandonment of the SCR.

Government to review summary care records rollout - Pulse

Summary Care Records scheme at risk - IT Projects Blog

Summary Care Records - too big to fail - IT Projects Blog

2 Comments

  • But nothing's stopped has it? No "suspension" no "halt". Data is continuing to be uploaded to the SCR without adequate consent. Hospitals are still planning to upload data to the SCR (albeit refusing to be open about the governance arrangements).

    Nothing has changed. This "review" announcement buys the DoH more time for more uploads. The BMA have been fooled once more.

  • Good point. A "review" sounds good to journalists and will appease some SCR sceptics but actually may nothing at all.

    That said, the UCL report, which may be published this week, will highlight some profound weaknesses with the scheme - what the draft UCL report on SCRs referred to as "wicked problems".

    Once the report is published, it's difficult to see how the government can continue SCR uploads without a review.

  • Leave a comment

    Subscribe to blog feed

    Archives

    -- Advertisement --