fazon - stock.adobe.com
Government wants to build digital ID system in-house
The Home Affairs Committee hearing on digital ID reveals consultation is due next week; there will be no central database; and while government wants to build the system in-house, it will not replace private digital ID providers
UK prime minister Keir Starmer’s chief secretary, Darren Jones, would like to build the government’s digital ID system in-house, rather than outsource it, he has told the Home Affairs Committee.
In a hearing on the government’s plans for digital ID, Jones said that while the government does not want to undermine the digital identity industry, the system would need to be built by government itself.
“I would like to think about how we build the technology ourselves, in-house, as opposed to outsourcing it to, say, a big American tech company, and integrate it into what we already have, so that it does not become a huge, stand-alone, multibillion-pound, 10-year and huge bill-driven piece of government IT, but is literally something that can be done quite simply,” he said.
“You have the option of a private sector company having your login details to access your private information in public services. My sense is that the public would rather have a login to their public sector data without it all going via third-party private sector companies.
“We can benefit from the know-how and innovation that exists, but my view – again, this is subject to consultation – is that I would rather build this in-house in government, as opposed to having an external private company run such a foundational technology for access to public services,” said Jones.
The digital identity industry has been concerned that the plans for a government digital identity system would undermine and sideline an already thriving UK marketplace.
However, Jones added that the government is still keen to continue to work with the private sector, and highlighted the success of the digital ID industry in the UK.
“I do not want a government programme that either tries to replicate what they have done or undermines their business,” he said. “It is important to me that we work in partnership, for the benefit of them and their private sector and export opportunities, as well as improving access to public services.”
Time to consult
Following the announcement of a digital ID in the UK by prime minister Keir Starmer in September 2025, the government promised to launch a public consultation on the scheme in the beginning of 2026. Jones told the committee that the consultation was due imminently, and would shape how the government takes the scheme forward.
Jones said this was not just a technical consultation for companies interested in digital ID, but something that the public can engage in.
“There will be traditional consultation methods, as you would expect – it is our legal requirement to do that – but we will be announcing shortly how we are going above and beyond that to involve the public in more of a national conversation about how it might be done,” he said.
He recognised that following the prime minister’s announcement about the scheme, the government stayed silent, which was a mistake. “We should not have left the period of silence,” he said, adding that there should have been public engagement right away to allow the public to fully understand the goal behind the digital ID.
“We saw off the back of the digital ID announcement was a lot of mis- and disinformation that scared people, and we were pretty silent about what we wanted it to be and what the benefits were. We have to make sure that we do that more effectively online, as well as through the traditional mechanisms,” Jones said, adding that he hoped the consultation would help people better understand and alleviate fears.
Privacy concerns and legacy IT
Originally, the digital ID scheme was billed as a mandatory for for right-to-work checks, however in January 2026, the government backtracked on this and removed the compulsory aspect, following uproar from privacy campaigners.
While employers will be required to conduct right-to-work checks digitally by 2029, employees will not be obliged to hold a government digital ID, and able to choose between using physical documents, private sector ID or the government’s version.
“We will provide a digital ID that will be free for people to have but only if they want to have it and use it. If they still want to use their physical passport and non-Government providers of ID verification, they are perfectly entitled to do so,” Jones said.
The Home Affairs Committee also highlighted concerns from the public around the privacy aspect of a digital ID, with people fearing the UK is becoming a surveillance state, and the impact it could have on the public.
Jones said that this was misinformation and that he envisioned a federated data system where different types of data are secure in different departments, but that if a person gives government permission, it can pull that together to provide a service.
“What I want to try to achieve is that you get more control over your data than you do now, and more control over your data than you might do with private sector companies, so that you are in control and there is transparency,” he said.
“We will be consulting on some of the questions on security standards. I have asked the team to make sure it is at least equivalent to banking level security, with banking apps. Some of that is about device-level security, two-factor authentication and those types of things, but we will also have system security requirements about where the data is being held and how it interacts with other IT systems.
“My personal view – as opposed to government policy, because we have not consulted – is that I would rather that was built and held by the government with parliamentary oversight and accountability as opposed to outsourcing it to a private company to run on our behalf.”
Read more about digital ID and government:
- Last year, the UK government announced ambitious plans for a national digital identity scheme, but will 2026 lead to more disenchantment or new excitement?
- The proposed national digital identity app will no longer be compulsory for conducting right-to-work checks, removing the most contentious and widely criticised element of the scheme.
- MPs brand the government’s digital ID plans ‘un-British’ and ‘an attack on civil liberties’ during debate on the controversial policy.
However, one of the key challenges with the government building and holding the data in-house, is that Whitehall is fraught with legacy systems. In order to create a fully functioning digital ID across government departments, it would need to ensure all legacy systems were upgraded or replaced.
Jones said that subject to the consultation, the government is looking at how the current passport system functions and building from the existing Gov.uk App and Gov.uk Wallet.
“The challenge for us on legacy IT will be in the future when we are trying to take an existing customer service that may be on a legacy IT system and onboard it to the app, which will have to be a cloud-based system. That is when the business case comes into play. For some services it may end up being more expensive as you transition off legacy IT into the new one,” he said, adding that he did not envision any legacy IT problems for the actual digital ID build.
The future of digital ID
While the initial use for digital ID by the end of this Parliament in 2029 is solely focused on right-to-work checks, Jones said he is more focused on the “bigger prize” of being able to use digital ID across government services.
“There are lots of simple customer service issues that are absolutely capable of being put into one place. In time, we can then deal with some of the bigger, more complicated ones that should be much easier for people,” he said, adding that this includes local government services.
“My sense is that the early examples are probably going to be the smaller, simpler ones, just as we start to get the system working before we get to the bigger prizes that will be available in the years ahead.”
