turtl3 - Fotolia

Communication Workers Union warns subpostmasters of flaw in Post Office Horizon accounting system

The union that represents Post Office subpostmasters has warned of a problem with the Horizon accounting system at the centre of a long-running dispute

Post Office subpostmasters have been warned of a problem with the Horizon computer system they use for accounts, which can lead to cash shortfalls if undetected.

An email to members of the Communication Workers Union (CWU) branch representing postmasters, seen by Computer Weekly, was sent to advise them what to look out for regarding the alleged fault, which incorrectly duplicates payments.

This is a small but potentially significant development in a dispute over the Horizon system that has been running for years. The finding, if proved, could call into question Post Office claims that Horizon has no systemic flaws.

Post Offices use an IT system developed by ICL/Fujitsu Services, called Horizon, for their accounts. In 2009 Computer Weekly first revealed the stories of subpostmasters who had received heavy fines and even jail terms for alleged false accounting – which they blamed on the Horizon accounting system. The Post Office has vehemently denied this claim. (See timeline below for more on the dispute).

The alleged problem investigated by the CWU involves the process where subpostmasters transfer money from a core Post Office branch to a remote branch created to serve rural areas, known as an outreach, which is basically a branch on a laptop. These processes are known as remittances.

According to the CWU, branch payments can in certain circumstances be duplicated – in effect creating a record of money that does not exist, recorded by the system as being in the outreach branch. It would be the subpostmaster’s responsibility to make up this sum unless the duplicated payments are removed.

The CWU said that, in a case documented by investigators, a core branch transferred cash to an outreach branch and Horizon reduced the accounts of the core by the amount transferred. The outreach transferred in the amount sent and Horizon accepted the correct amount.

But Horizon did this four times, causing a loss of three times the actual amount sent. The discrepancy was for money that did not exist.

“We have evidence that Horizon has duplicated the accepting in of a remittance (on at least three occasions). This is despite the [payment’s] barcode having only been scanned in once,” said the CWU email.

The Post Office helpline – the Network Business Support Centre – and the IT helpline were contacted, but neither was able to help the postmaster, said the CWU.

Post Office department recognises duplication problem

Following a post on a web forum, another postmaster recognised the problem as something she had experienced in the past, and the financial department of the Post Office in Chesterfield was contacted on her advice.

According to the postmasters' branch of the CWU, the financial department recognised the issue and told the postmaster they would need to send a positive monetary change to the Horizon branch accounts to negate the non-existent loss that had been created by the duplication.

The alleged fault, if proved, would question the Post Office’s continued claims that there are no systemic faults in Horizon.

The Post Office denies system-wide problems with Horizon and stressed that no technical fault has been found to have been responsible for a postmaster being “wrongly held responsible for a loss”.

“[We have] robust back-office reconciliation processes to identify and address account balancing issues when they arise,” said the Post Office.

“The Post Office provides extensive support, including visits to branches, if postmasters need support about branch accounting or other aspects of running their branch, and we encourage them to contact us if they have any concerns,” it added.

“It remains the case that more than three years of investigations have not identified any transaction caused by a technical fault in Horizon which resulted in a postmaster wrongly being held responsible for a loss.”

Mark Baker, secretary of the CWU postmasters branch, said: “If we get complaints we have people with the skills to investigate the Horizon system on behalf of subpostmasters. In the process of doing this recently, we believe we have found another systemic flaw.”

Horizon 'systemically flawed' says Second Sight's independent report

The CWU claims this is one example of a glitch that could happen anywhere across the network, and is not restricted to one type of transaction or branch.

While the Post Office has said that occasional problems occur, it stresses there are no systemic glitches.

There have however been claims of alleged problems in the past by experts, but the Post Office has always denied they represent evidence of systemic flaws.

The results of an independent investigation, commissioned by the Post Office and carried out by forensic investigation company Second Sight, were published in April 2015. The report said there can be systemic problems for users: “As we have previously stated, when looking at the totality of the Horizon experience we remain concerned that, in some circumstances, Horizon can be systemically flawed from a user’s perspective and Post Office has not necessarily provided an appropriate level of support.”

When Computer Weekly put the claims to the Department for Business, Innovation and Skills (BIS) at the time of the report, the BIS press office said: “Systemic flaws would refer to errors or faults in the Horizon system capable of causing the accounting discrepancies that have been alleged.

"Rather, the sentence summarises the conclusions Second Sight reached, based on their findings having looked at not only the Horizon system but other directly and indirectly associated elements, such as training and support processes, and individual subpostmasters’ circumstances.”

Campaigners want an independent inquiry. “The only way we will get to the bottom of it is to have a truly independent inquiry, which Post Office is not involved in,” said one.

The Criminal Courts Review Commission (CCRC) is currently reviewing subpostmasters' claims of wrongful prosecution.

The CCRC has set up a team to focus on the cases including subpostmasters that received suspended or non-custodial sentences, including community service, but others that received custodial sentences for between six and 18 months.

Read Computer Weekly timeline of events

CW+

Features

Enjoy the benefits of CW+ membership, learn more and join.

Read more on IT for government and public sector

Join the conversation

2 comments

Send me notifications when other members comment.

By submitting you agree to receive email from TechTarget and its partners. If you reside outside of the United States, you consent to having your personal data transferred to and processed in the United States. Privacy

Please create a username to comment.

BIS has demonstrated a flaw in Fujitsu's Horizon internet technology that leads to systematic issues with financial transactions duplication's. The Post Office or rather Fujistu has allowed old antiquated dial up technology to be plugged into the Horizon system that lacks a filter parameter in its chip-set written programming, for example 2+2=5 such a calculation must be automatically declined/rejected.In the erroneous processing that result in duplicate financial transaction must also be automatically be declined, it must never be the burden of a Sub-Postmaster or Mistress to correct erronous written Horizon programming
Cancel
This type of articial financial account records, demonstrates Fujistu's lack of consideration  for unseen set of circumastances, while Horizon system may duplicate a financial transaction and records monies that do not exist for what ever the reason by Fujitsu,probably a malfunction it demonstrates and explains a cause of deficits in Sub-Postmasters and mistresses financial records accounting.
It is called in computer programming 'filter perameters' while Fujistsu uses a duplicating systems for monies that do not exist, there should have been Filter perameters which rejects/declines such non existing monies from showing up on Sub-postmasters and Mistress financial accounts records.
A filter parameter example is  the insufficient funds facility attached to all savings only accounts, EG I have $500 in my accounty and I attempt to withdraw $600 the insufficint funds facility automatically delcines the withdraw as insufficient funds.There is a lack of a filter parameter to decline duplicate financial transactions from showing an amount of monies in Horizon's data base that does not exist.
From my personal experience with duplications I concurr with CWU.Share your comment
Cancel

-ADS BY GOOGLE

SearchCIO

SearchSecurity

SearchNetworking

SearchDataCenter

SearchDataManagement

Close