Cisco Systems hasn't always gotten a positive response
over its security efforts, the best example being the backlash it
suffered after trying tostop researcher Michael Lynn from
showing off a Cisco IOS exploit at the 2005 Black Hat
conference. But when it comes to the
company's more recent moves to integrate security into its
product line, customers are optimistic.
The networking giant last week finalised its
acquisition of Internet security gateway appliance vendor
IronPort Systems for $830 million in cash and stock, and will
add IronPort's email and messaging security features into its
security product set. Cisco said the acquisition is also a major
step forward in the evolution of Cisco's Self-Defending Network
initiative.
The IronPort acquisition reflects the larger trend of
consolidation in the IT security market, as standalone security
vendors struggle to survive and big IT infrastructure providers use
acquisitions to integrate more security into its product
development lifecycles. In the last month, for example,
HP has announced its acquisition of SPI Dynamics and
IBM has announced its purchase of Watchfire .
While IT professionals have lauded the smoothness of some
acquisitions, such as the merging of
Internet Security Systems (ISS) into IBM and
the merging of
CipherTrust Inc. into Secure Computing
Corp., they say they've watched other vendors buy up good
security technology only to let it languish.
But Cisco users interviewed in recent days say they're not
concerned. They're generally pleased with Cisco's security efforts
and believe the vendor will handle the IronPort integration with
care.
"I read on Cisco's Web site that some of the reputation
technologies IronPort uses to determine if data is legitimate or
not are going to be integrated into the IOS and firewall
feature-set," said Stephen Escher, network security manager for the
Hilton Grand Vacations Company in Orlando, Fla., in an email
exchange. "Any additional tools that Cisco provides to examine
network data from an upper-layer perspective is useful for network
engineers."
Escher's IT infrastructure includes Cisco technology and he is
largely happy with the vendor because its products have proven
reliable and compatible with the Windows, Apple MacIntosh and
Unix-based machines his company also uses. His only criticism is
that Cisco products like the Monitoring, Analysis and Response
System (MARS) and Access Control Server (ACS) could use better
visual interfaces.
As for the vendor's efforts to acquire and integrate security
technology, he said, "I would rather have a large solution instead
of a bunch of smaller [security] vendors who may or may not be
there a year from now; not to mention having to support all the
different systems."
Eric Nooden, information systems manager for Rockford,
Ill.-based Rockford Gastroenterology Associates, does not have a
Cisco-based infrastructure as Escher does. But he said he's
generally a fan of the company's technology and is planning to
incorporate Cisco products into his network in the future.
"We are waiting for our current firewall to die before we move
to Cisco's new line of firewalls and security products," he said in
an email exchange. "For the last three years I have requested the
new firewall and security software and it has been approved, but
with the understanding that his firewall has to die or have an
unfixable security hole before he can get the new toys."
Nooden also supports the trend of big IT vendors like Cisco
using acquisitions to improve their security, and believes Cisco
will handle the IronPort integration properly.
"If you look at past purchases of Cisco, specifically Aironet, I
think they will handle the [IronPort] acquisition well," he said.
"In the beginning, all of Cisco's wireless bridges were rebranded
Aironet products. If you purchased a 340 bridge, you had the chance
of getting either a box with Aironet branding on it or Cisco's. The
350 Bridge was a smooth upgrade from Aironet to Cisco."
Cisco executives promise an equally smooth transition with
IronPort.
"We've lost none of our engineers [in the acquisition]," Scott
Weiss, former CEO of IronPort and now general manager of the
IronPort Business Unit, said during a recent meeting with editors
of SearchSecurity.com and Information Security magazine. "We're not
merging IronPort into Cisco. We'll still have the same team, the
same office and I don't think the culture is going to change. We're
keeping the band together."
Mick Scully, vice president of product management in Cisco's
Security Technology Group, promised a seamless integration in which
IronPort's talent base is retained and more investments are made in
the company's technology. Scully noted that one of the things Cisco
looks for when making an acquisition is the talent of the company
in question. He added that there has been very little turnover
after past acquisitions.
IronPort, based in San Bruno, Calif., was founded in 2000 and
has 3,000 customers. Its 400 employees are expected to remain on
board and the company will continue to run as a separate business
unit in Cisco's Security Technology Group.