md3d - Fotolia

Australian government technology suffers failure after failure

Former government IT leader says Australia’s IT is so bad that if the government were a private sector organisation, it would fail

This article can also be found in the Premium Editorial Download: CW ANZ: CW ANZ: Immersed in cloud

Australia’s government technology systems are so poor that were it a private company, it would go out of business or be shut down by regulators. That is the damning assessment of the man who, for 16 months, led the government’s charge to digitally transform itself and its services.

Paul Shetler, formerly chief executive officer of the Digital Transformation Office (DTO), and then chief digital officer of the organisation’s successor, the Digital Transformation Agency, resigned in late 2016 following a dispute with Angus Taylor, assistant minister for cities and digital transformation.

Under Taylor’s watch, the role of the digital transformation team has shifted from delivery of transformational systems to development of policy, according to Shetler, who told the Australian Broadcasting Corporation that the minister had also defunded a series of transformational projects that were in progress to focus on policy instead.

In the past six months, Australians have endured failure after failure of online government services, including the online census, the flawed MyGov portal, the Australian Taxation Office’s multi-day outage late last year, and most recently Centrelink’s issuing of 170,000 debt recovery notices to people who had received social security benefits, with up to 20% of the notices now understood to have been issued in error because of a flawed data-matching algorithm.

The Commonwealth ombudsman has announced an investigation into the Centrelink debacle, but human services minister Alan Tudge is adamant that Centrelink’s IT systems are functioning well and will continue to operate.

But Shetler said it was “appalling that this kind of thing is happening”, that the system was manifestly not working well and would have sent a commercial organisation out of business.

“In any other government, this would be viewed as a really bad thing,” he said. “It is not OK when the government cannot deliver the basic service we are paying for.”

Shetler questioned whether the government had the necessary political will for change.

Read more about government IT in Australia

Australia’s political landscape has shifted significantly since the DTO was conceived and Shetler was appointed by then communications minister Malcolm Turnbull. In the intervening months, Turnbull became prime minister and was then re-elected with a wafer-thin majority for his coalition government, shrinking his mandate and the opportunity for change.

At the same time, government insiders say there have been attempts to stall digital transformation at both national and state levels. Shetler said Australia’s “incredibly Balkanised bureaucracy” acted as a brake on innovation.

And at state level, New South Wales minister for innovation and better regulation Victor Dominello told the Australian Computer Society’s annual conference in December that bureaucrats could be “the gatekeepers from hell” when it came to the digital transformation of services.

At the same conference, Stephen Conroy, former Labor minister for broadband communications and the digital economy, warned that driving any sort of change through Australia’s bureaucracy was a big challenge as different silos played “various tricks” to protect their patches.

Shetler said that if Australia was serious about digital transformation, it needed to radically upskill the public service so it could develop and leverage modern IT services and put users’ needs first.

Read more on IT for government and public sector

Join the conversation

1 comment

Send me notifications when other members comment.

Please create a username to comment.

This is what I put up on the YouTube video on which this article is based: This is what governments do.  It follows from how portfolios are doled out to ministers.  A minister needs to know nothing about his portfolio.  The academic background of Angus Taylor, verbatim from his own website, is: "Angus has a Bachelor of Economics (First Class Honours and University Medal) and a Bachelor of Laws (Honours) from the University of Sydney. He also has a Master of Philosophy in Economics from Oxford, where he studied as a Rhodes Scholar."  Philosophy is another word for BS.  It would be hard to find somebody more unsuitable to be at the head of a science based portfolio.  What has happened is what one can expect.  And it happens all the time all over the world.
Cancel

-ADS BY GOOGLE

SearchCIO

SearchSecurity

SearchNetworking

SearchDataCenter

  • How do I size a UPS unit?

    Your data center UPS sizing needs are dependent on a variety of factors. Develop configurations and determine the estimated UPS ...

  • How to enhance FTP server security

    If you still use FTP servers in your organization, use IP address whitelists, login restrictions and data encryption -- and just ...

  • 3 ways to approach cloud bursting

    With different cloud bursting techniques and tools from Amazon, Zerto, VMware and Oracle, admins can bolster cloud connections ...

SearchDataManagement

Close