Getty Images
Police do not have to explain to lawyer Fahad Ansari why they seized his phone data, says court
A high court judge has ruled that police do not have to give reasons to lawyer, who acts for Hamas, why they seized his mobile phone data
Police do not have to give a lawyer who was stopped, questioned and had his work mobile phone seized for forensic examination reasons for their actions, the UK’s high court has ruled.
The decision means that lawyers can be subject to counter-terrorism powers and have their privileged communications extracted and examined by the state, without having the right to know the case against them, said advocacy group Cage.
Fahad Ansari, who acts for Hamas in a legal appeal to have its proscribed status in the UK overturned, was stopped by police under Schedule 7 of the terrorist act while returning from holiday with his family last year.
The case is believed to be the first targeted use of Schedule 7 powers, which allow police to stop and question people and seize their electronic devices without the need for suspicion, against a practising solicitor.
Ansari, who specialises in human rights and national security cases, believes he was stopped because he is representing Hamas, a banned terrorist organisation in the UK, in an appeal to challenge its proscribed status through the Proscribed Organisations Appeal Commission.
The high court ruled on 4 March that police may present evidence about the reasons stopping Ansari in a closed court in front of a special advocate without Ansari or his lawyers being present – preventing Ansari or his legal team from learning the reasons why he was stopped.
Lawyers for Ansari argued the lawyer was entitled to be given a sufficient “gist” of the police’s case against him to enable him to disprove the police’s case, even if doing so would be damaging to national security.
Privileged material
Hugh Southey KC told the court in October 2025 that Ansari’s work phone contained data going back 15 years, including privileged material relating to his clients, and that any data extracted by the police should be deleted.
Ansari, an Irish citizen, argues that he was unlawfully stopped, detained and questioned under Schedule 7 of the Terrorism Act when he disembarked from a ferry with his family at Holyhead after visiting relatives in Ireland in August 2025.
The court was told last year that the phone contains details of at least 3,000 contacts, voice notes, memos, case papers, search terms and metadata, the overwhelming proportion of which is likely to be legally protected.
Justice Chamberlian found in a judgment published today the question was not whether any allegations made against Ansari by police in closed hearings were true, but whether police had a lawful basis for stopping and searching the lawyer at the time the search was carried out.
He found in a 15-page ruling that the use of Schedule 7 powers against Ansari to question him and seize his phone does not require any allegation to have been made against him, and that the seizure and retention of his personal information does not affect Ansari’s legal position.
The judge found that there were “substantial protections” in place to protect the integrity of legally privileged information, and that even if legally privileged material could be used against third parties, which it could not, they would enjoy the “full panoply of procedural rights”.
Read more about the case
- Hamas lawyer seeks appeal following police’s seizure of his phone at Welsh port: Police ordered to give reasons in closed court for seizing phone of UK Hamas lawyer.
- Police say that solicitors cannot have a ‘cast iron defence’ to protect their electronic devices from ever being searched: London court orders police to disclose reasons for seizing and copying the contents of a phone belonging to a UK lawyer who represented Hamas, but refuses an injunction to prevent police from reviewing the phone until after judicial review
- Hamas lawyer challenges police after they seized legal files from phone in Schedule 7 stop: A UK solicitor hired by Hamas to challenge its proscription in the UK as a terrorist organisation argues police acted unlawfully by seizing a phone containing confidential legally privileged material about his clients.
Ansari said he handed over the password to his phone after police warned him that to fail to do so would be an arrestable offence. He said that police also questioned him about Palestine Action, a direct action protest group that was proscribed under the Terrorism Act 2000, though Ansari has no connection with the group.
South Wales Police, which is responsible for counter-terrorism in Wales, has denied that Ansari was stopped because of his political views, and maintains that asking him questions about proscribed organisations is not unlawful.
Ansari, a registered freelance solicitor, became consultant at Duncan Lewis Solicitors, where he specialises in national security and complex human rights cases, after training at Fisher Meredith LLP and Birnberg Peirce.
Speaking after the judgement, Ansari said he would challenge the judge’s order that the police should not disclose their reasons for stopping him in open court.
“Seven months on, I remain in the dark about why counter-terrorism police detained and interrogated me and continue to examine the contents of my work phone,” he added. “I am exploring all options to challenge this dangerous precedent.”
Commenting on the case, Anas Mustapha, head of public advocacy at Cage, said that allowing secret evidence was a “thin end of the wedge” that could undermine justice. “Once courts accept that the state can accuse someone without revealing the accusation, the foundations of justice begin to collapse,” he added.
“The legal profession now faces a serious question: whether it will continue to accommodate secret courts through mechanisms like the special advocate system, or whether it will begin the difficult work of rolling back a process that has steadily eroded open justice for more than two decades,” said Mustapha.
Timeline of Fahad Ansari’s Schedule 7 stop
6 August 2025
17.32: Fahad Ansari is stopped at Holyhead after arriving in a car with his family on a passenger ferry.
17.25: Ansari is detained by police officers from North Wales Police under Schedule 7 of the Terrorism Act.
17.30: A police examining officer seizes a black iPhone 15 belonging to Ansari.
18.15: A police review officer conducts a review of Ansari’s detention while his solicitor attends on speaker phone. She asks for the review to be delayed, but the request is refused.
19.00: Ansari agrees to have his fingerprints and DNA samples taken. He hands over his passwords and PIN to access his mobile phone.
19.58: Ansari is released after questioning.
7 August 2025
A police officer opens the exhibit bag containing Ansari’s phone. According to the police, the digital forensic equipment is incompatible with Ansari’s phone and arrangements are made to transfer it to the Heathrow Digital Forensics unit to be copied. Police say the phone was resealed and returned to secure storage without being accessed.
8 August 2025
Ansari’s mobile phone is sealed and transferred to Heathrow Digital Forensics unit, where its contents are copied.
12 August 2025
Police collect Ansari’s mobile phone and send it back to him by recorded delivery.
13 August 2025
Ansari’s mobile phone is returned to him. Police say data copied from Ansari’s phone is securely sealed and awaiting review by an independent counsel.
21 August 2025
Ansari sends a pre-action letter, asking for the reasons for his stop and the retention of the contents of his work phone.
1 September 2025
Counter-terrorism police contact Ansari to request search terms that could be used to identify protected material on his phone.
10 September 2025
Ansari sends a further letter asking the police to agree not to examine, sift or share the contents of his work phone, pending resolution of the claim.
12 September 2025
Counter-terrorism police refuse to provide reasons for stopping Ansari and refuse to agree not to examine, sift or share the contents of his phone.
17 September 2025
Ansari files a claim for a judicial review against the chief constable of North Wales Police and the Home Office.
6 October 2025
The high court orders North Wales police to disclose the reasons for stopping Ansari under Schedule 7 of the Terrorism Act to a closed court hearing. The court refused to issue an order preventing a special counsel from examining the data on Ansari’s phone.
27 October 2025
Ansari says he will seek an appeal after the high court refuses an interim injunction to prevent the examination of his mobile phone.
21 January 2026
The court considers arguments whether Ansari had the legal right to be provided with a “gist” of the case against him to allow him to disprove the police’s case.
27 January 2026
A closed court hearing considers whether material provided by a Special Advocate should be disclosed in open court.
Read more on Privacy and data protection
-
![]()
Spanish court acquits suspects denied access to ‘raw’ Sky ECC intercepts in landmark decision
By: Bill Goodwin
-
![]()
Privacy will be under unprecedented attack in 2026
By: Bill Goodwin
-
![]()
Top 10 surveillance, journalism and encryption stories of 2025
By: Bill Goodwin
-
![]()
Hamas lawyer seeks appeal following police’s seizure of his phone at Welsh port
By: Cormac Kehoe
