Government launches outcome of digital ID consultation

Building trust in the new system

According to the government, the respondents welcomed proposals for the governance framework, as this was understood as a way to build trust and confidence in the new system. On the other hand, responses on the location of a governance function were not conclusive.

Moreover, the outcome of the consultation noted respondents supported the idea that governance arrangements should be flexible and proportionate as the standards of the trust framework evolved in response to the maturing market.

To address this, the Office for Digital Identities and Attributes (ODIA) will be set up in the Department for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport (DCMS) as an interim governing body for digital identities. According to the document, a permanent location will be sought for the governance function and the ODIA will work with key stakeholders through the process.

Meanwhile, the consultation outcome outlined the functions of the ODIA. The the new body will have power to issue trust marks. It will “ensure trust-marked organisations adhere to the highest standards of security and privacy”, the DCMS said.

The publication of the consultation outcomes was accompanied by a statement in the consultation that the government is not proposing a system that could lead to the announcement of mandatory ID cards.

According to the consultation, many of the individuals who responded to the consultation said they were against the roll-out of a compulsory ID card.

“The government has heard this and has no plans to make the use of digital identities compulsory,” it said. “The government also understands that there is no public support for ID cards in the UK and has no plans to introduce ID cards.”

The proposals set out in the consultation outcome will not require the roll-out of ID cards. Instead, the suggestions are aimed at creating trust and confidence in methods to prove identity and eligibility, the document noted.

“This means that, when it suits people to prove things about themselves or others on the basis of a digital identity, this can be achieved with as much ease and security as is offered by physical proofs of identity such as a passport,” it added.

The rationale for digital ID

DCMS argued that digital identities will be useful in tackling fraud, which an estimated five million cases in the year ending September 2021, according to numbers cited by DCMS. The idea is that reducing the amount of personal data shared online will make it harder for fraudsters to obtain and use stolen identities.

Moves to advance digital ID in the UK are also part of a business-driven agenda, with a set of “interlinked policy initiatives led by the government to prepare the UK for the digital world and to improve the lives of businesses and citizens”, said Heather Wheeler, parliamentary secretary to the Cabinet Office, in relation to projects such as One Login, the digital identity platform currently being developed by the Government Digital Service.

“These initiatives, alongside enabling legislation, will help ensure the UK is able to take full advantage of the opportunities that digital identities and the wider digital economy have to offer,” she said.

Industry body techUK described the publication of the outcomes as a “positive step forward in the UK’s implementation of digital identity”, and “has welcomed DCMS’s efforts in working with industry to get us to where we are today” – but stressed that public trust needs to be built in the process.

“Given the next steps now being taken, continued cooperation between industry and government remains the best chance for a successful implementation of a digital identity ecosystem in the UK,” said Sue Daley, director for technology and innovation at techUK.

“However, we must also ensure we bring citizens on this journey with us: building public trust and confidence in Digital ID must be a key priority as we move forward.”