Access your Pro+ Content below.
SAN vs NAS vs hyper-converged for virtual machine storage
This article is part of the MicroScope issue of July 2019
Virtualisation is a cornerstone of today’s enterprise IT architecture, but virtual machines pose a number of performance issues, despite the benefits they bring in cost and efficiency. Storage is a particular weakness in virtualisation. Virtualisation-optimised storage technologies have been slower to develop, despite the rise of high-performance hardware, such as flash. Newer technologies, such as hyper-converged infrastructure (HCI) simplify IT deployments and provide an alternative for enterprises running VMs. But, they have downsides too, especially where businesses need to scale up storage capacity. And they demand new skills. So, what are the pros and cons of using SAN, NAS and hyper-converged for virtual machine storage? With so much now running on virtual machines it is increasingly hard to separate the needs of virtualised workloads from the conventional aspects of their deployment. They do, however, require storage for the operating system, applications and their data. In addition, virtual systems to store the ...
Access this CW+ Content for Free!
Features in this issue
Theresa May’s impending departure has only deepened the confusion surrounding Brexit – so what does the business community make of it all?
The pros and cons of file and block access storage arrays vs the new breed of all-in-one server/storage architecture for storage of virtual machine systems and data
Has Facebook boss seen the light on user privacy?