jules - Fotolia
Private cloud: Orchestration, storage and containers
We look at the key requirements and components of private cloud – including the use of container platforms – and the impact of private cloud on storage in the datacentre
Cloud, to most people, means public cloud infrastructure, such as that offered by Amazon Web Services (AWS) and Microsoft Azure.
Continue Reading This Article
Enjoy this article as well as all of our content, including E-Guides, news, tips and more.
In contrast, private cloud tends to refer to on-premise infrastructure that functions in the same way as public cloud, by offering access to resources on a service-based delivery model.
So, what is involved in building a private cloud and how does it impact on storage in the datacentre?
Before we dive into how a private cloud can be implemented, we should take a moment to review the features of cloud in general.
Cloud, whether private or public, is expected to meet the following criteria:
- Elasticity – The ability to scale up or down on demand from the user. From the perspective of the user, cloud resources are typically seen as “unlimited”, although in private clouds where budgeting occurs, the idea of limitless is likely to be constrained.
- Service-based – Resources are delivered as services, with service definitions and abstraction from the hardware used to deliver them. Requests are made for virtual instances – rather than servers – or storage capacity based on performance and latency needs.
- Multi-tenancy – Infrastructure needs to support multiple users, without those users being aware of or impacted by others on the same platform.
- On-demand access – The ability to request and have resources configured automatically, typically through a portal or application programming interface (API).
- Billing & Reporting – Features that enable the reporting of usage statistics, billing done at a high level of granularity, typically per hour or day (note that public cloud providers charge per hour, which may not be practical or appropriate for private infrastructure).
In a private cloud, some features seen in the public arena are not necessarily required.
Some organisations may choose not to implement billing (or even chargeback), for example, as the financial mechanism for directly charging business units for their usage may not exist.
The idea of “unlimited” is typically not a private cloud requirement, as IT budgets are generally restricted, whether that refers to the spending of the business or the IT department.
Private cloud orchestration
A key part of private cloud is the orchestration framework that provisions resources based on customer requests. These include open-source platforms such as OpenStack and CloudStack, proprietary tools such as VMware’s vRealize Suite Cloud Management Platform and the upcoming Azure Stack, Microsoft’s on-premise automation suite implementation of public Azure.
There are also platforms, such as Mesosphere, Kubernetes and Docker Swarm, that provide open source solutions that go part way to implementing private cloud.
Finally, we should mention that suppliers, such as Zerostack and Platform 9, that are looking to optimise some of the tools we’ve already mentioned.
Storage for private cloud
When we look at the way storage is consumed by these platforms, we see a wide variety of implementations.
Possibly the most mature and easily understood storage options are for VMware.
VMware vSphere, which is a core component of the vRealize Suite, supports a range of existing block (Fibre Channel, iSCSI) and file (NFS) based systems. Supplier support is widespread, and once storage is configured into the infrastructure, it can be provisioned out automatically as part of virtual machine .
Read more about cloud storage
- Cloud storage provides cost savings and ease of management, but there are pitfalls. Here are the top five things that can go wrong.
- VMware vs OpenStack: The opportunities and challenges presented by the two virtualisation environments when it comes to storage, backup and disaster recovery.
OpenStack has a range of storage support options, described as projects, that cover block storage (Cinder), file (Manila) and object (Swift). Each project defines a set of APIs that suppliers can code to, automating the provisioning and mapping of their storage platforms to instances (virtual machines) by the OpenStack platform.
The same level of application programming interface support is also available within Kubernetes, enabling the provisioning of persistent storage to container instances.
This can include traditional protocols (such as iSCSI and NFS), but also scale-out storage such as GlusterFS and Ceph. There’s more of an assumption here that users need to manage their storage manually (perhaps simply as local JBODs), but storage hardware suppliers are starting to add support for Kubernetes volumes. One example is NetApp with their Trident project to automate storage provisioning.
Docker deployments tend to use storage provisioned to the host running containers, which could be a local file system or block devices mounted to the server. Flocker is an open source tool that enables the automation of provisioning block devices to containers through a set of APIs for which suppliers can provide support. Through their EMCCode efforts, Dell EMC supports connectivity for many of their existing storage platforms to a Docker ecosystem. Much of this work is best efforts and only community supported, so perhaps not suited to critical production environments.
Adding storage to private cloud
We can see from the way storage is consumed by private clouds that there are certain differences that must be considered. The most obvious is that of automation. Storage is expected to plug into orchestration frameworks in a way that makes it easy to auto-provision logical unit numbers (LUNs) and file shares through the orchestration tools.
This automation represents two issues.
, there is security. Can storage be presented from a pool of resources, or does the orchestration platform get access to the whole storage array or environment?
Second, what controls are in place to limit the consumption of storage resources? We can envisage a scenario where the on-demand capability of private cloud could exhaust the storage capacity available.
This issue takes us on to the issue of maintenance. How easily can a storage solution be expanded or replaced?
Typically, storage migrations are implemented as big projects that consume significant resources. This doesn’t arise as an issue in the public cloud environment, where storage issues are obfuscated from the customer.
How storage migrations be managed in private cloud?
As instances are created or destroyed, applications can be provisioned from storage capacity. That leaves the migration of existing instances to take care of. These may have to be migrated offline or through some sort of snapshot process. Either way, the introduction of a storage platform needs to be implemented with a minimal impact to service.
It’s worth noting that most of the above issues haven’t been fully resolved. As a result, an entire storage platform may be presented to a cloud solution, for example, rather than shared with other users because the required security controls don’t exist. This may be practical in large environments, but could cause issues for smaller IT organisations.
Choosing the right supplier
Picking a supplier or storage product requires thought about the orchestration platform and supportability from the storage supplier.
Older (and more likely to be classed as legacy) platforms will be harder to integrate, as they usually have no native automation capabilities. These tend to have been added on later. NetApp SolidFire is an example of a storage platform that provides a native API, with supported integration into all the common provisioning platforms.
An alternative is to go for a scale-out storage solution, either an open source platform or one from an SDS provider. Ceph is one solution directly integrated into OpenStack that can provide object, block and file support.
There are also scale-out solutions like StorPool (block storage), StorageOS (specifically for containers), ScaleIO from EMC, StoreVirtual from HPE and of course native Virtual SAN from VMware.
The advantage of using these platforms is that storage can be deployed as part of the server, rather than having dedicated storage software. Integration of solutions like Virtual SAN, for example, are directly supported within vSphere, enabling policy-based provisioning of storage for virtual instances.
The options for building out private clouds and persistent storage are wide ranging and potentially confusing at glance. But remember the main tenets of public cloud (elasticity, on-demand, multi-tenancy and service-based) for a good basis to help choose the most appropriate solution for your private cloud infrastructure.