SAN vs. DAS: Which is better in terms of performance and scalability?

Ask the Expert

SAN vs. DAS: Which is better in terms of performance and scalability?

I want to buy a storage solution (of at least 10 TB) for my company, but I am unsure what one to go for. Do I go down the direct-attached storage (DAS) route or select a Fibre Channel SAN?

Continue Reading This Article

Enjoy this article as well as all of our content, including E-Guides, news, tips and more.
  • By submitting your personal information, you agree to receive emails regarding relevant products and special offers from TechTarget and its partners. You also agree that your personal information may be transferred and processed in the United States, and that you have read and agree to the Terms of Use and the Privacy Policy.

  • Safe Harbor

The choice of storage-area network (SAN) or direct-attached storage (DAS) depends on the server configuration you want it to support.

In a DAS configuration, storage array ports are linked directly to servers, whereas in a SAN a switched network infrastructure exists between storage and the servers. The major advantages of using a SAN are increased flexibility and scalability. SANs allow multiple hosts to access disk storage within a single array through a single port, thereby reducing waste and increasing return on investment.

Fibre Channel is the most common protocol used within SANs, although the use of IP storage networking (iSCSI) is increasing in popularity.

Typically, intelligent disk storage arrays are used in SAN environments. SAN-attached intelligent disk arrays offer additional functionality, including local replication and remote replication, snapshots, data deduplication and storage virtualization, and are highly resilient to failure of a single component.

Conversely, DAS array ports are connected in a 1-to-1 ratio with the server. While intelligent disk arrays can be used, it is more common to see Fibre Channel or SCSI-attached JBOD arrays used in a DAS configuration.

Unintelligent disk arrays are cheaper but do not offer the same levels of performance and scalability as their intelligent counterparts. Expanding DAS capacity can be tricky, requiring additional hardware purchases and outages as extra cards are installed into servers.

If your 10 TB is to be assigned to a single host and if this configuration is not likely to change, then the lowest cost option will be to use a directly-attached unintelligent disk array. However, if your 10 TB is to be distributed between multiple hosts and your data needs to be highly available or has high performance requirements, then a SAN-attached intelligent disk array will result in a much more flexible option.

This was first published in June 2010


COMMENTS powered by Disqus  //  Commenting policy