Is continuous data protection effective enough to be the only full data copy for disaster recovery?

Ask the Expert

Is continuous data protection effective enough to be the only full data copy for disaster recovery?

Is CDP effective against data corruptions? Don't you still need a full copy of the data somewhere for disaster recovery?

Continue Reading This Article

Enjoy this article as well as all of our content, including E-Guides, news, tips and more.
  • By submitting your personal information, you agree to receive emails regarding relevant products and special offers from TechTarget and its partners. You also agree that your personal information may be transferred and processed in the United States, and that you have read and agree to the Terms of Use and the Privacy Policy.

  • Safe Harbor

Continuous data protection (CDP) is effective against physical corruptions because it maintains one or more copies of your data, either locally or remotely, to ensure disaster recovery in the event of physical failure. Continuous data protection solutions are offered by a multitude of vendors in the form of either true CDP or near CDP. True CDP captures every data write as it occurs, while near CDP only offers point-in-time recovery. Near CDP capabilities have been present for years in numerous storage products that offer a combination of replication and snapshot capabilities.

When considering whether you need a full copy of your data elsewhere, you need to understand the data loss scenarios you're planning for, and whether they're logical or physical. Where CDP offers protection against physical loss or corruption, it further provides the ability to protect against logical corruption. Logical corruption is the bugbear of many data protection strategies which simply replicate data at the block level in whatever condition it exists. This means that if the primary data becomes logically corrupted then that corruption is replicated to your secondary target rendering it useless for recovery.

CDP offers similar benefits to snapshot technologies provided with array replication, but has greater granularity by providing point-in-time recovery based on the configured retention settings. Point-in-time recovery gives you the ability to restore data to a point prior to when corruption occurred. This provides a data protection strategy that not only protects against physical loss, but further protects against logical corruption by restoring the system up to the last write before that corruption occurred.

The type of data you're protecting will ultimately determine the continuous data protection strategy you require. A block-based CDP product will protect any application and associated data stored on that volume. An application-based CDP system is designed to protect only one application type, regardless of where it's stored. The former introduces greater versatility but typically does so at greater cost, while the latter tends to be less expensive with enhanced functionality designed for a specific application type.

CDP offers effective protection against logical and physical corruption, with a number of continuous data protection products offering true and near CDP in the same package. However, whether this is suitable as your only data copy, is ultimately up to your recovery time objective (RTO) and recovery point objective (RPO) metrics combined with compliance and regulatory governance that determine how and where you need to recover your data.

This was first published in September 2009


COMMENTS powered by Disqus  //  Commenting policy