Government could save by using security specialists

The government could save money if it paid for security from specialists rather than as an element of a much bigger project.

Calls for the government to open up IT procurement to smaller firms have often been made in the hardware and software areas but are now sounding loudly on the security front.

With the security aspect of IT often part of a larger contract there has been a potential for more funds to be spent than are needed.

The counter argument is that using a security specialist, one accredited to sell to the government, would not only save money but ensure best of breed protection was installed.

"Historically, the bigger suppliers have taken the lion's share of public sector contracts partly because of the tendering requirements, and partly because of the fear factor as there was a perception that 'bigger' provided a measure of security," said Chris Papa, managing director of Qubic.

"However over the years there have been some very high profile failures and suppliers being taken to court because of an inability to deliver on time and on budget," he added.



Find more MicroScope+ content and other member only offers, here.

Read more on Security Network Services

Start the conversation

Send me notifications when other members comment.

By submitting you agree to receive email from TechTarget and its partners. If you reside outside of the United States, you consent to having your personal data transferred to and processed in the United States. Privacy

Please create a username to comment.


  • CIO Trends #6: Nordics

    In this e-guide, read how the High North and Baltic Sea collaboration is about to undergo a serious and redefining makeover to ...

  • CIO Trends #6: Middle East

    In this e-guide we look at the role of information technology as the Arabian Gulf commits billions of dollars to building more ...

  • CIO Trends #6: Benelux

    In this e-guide, read about the Netherlands' coalition government's four year plan which includes the term 'cyber' no fewer than ...