Access your Pro+ Content below.
Patents = innovation? Maybe not
This article is part of the MicroScope issue of February 2017
Apparently, we are all supposed to be pleased by the news that IBM has been issued more than 8,000 patents in the US, breaking the record for most patents in a year. It’s also a cause for some celebration that there was a record total number of patents issued in 2016 (304,126). IBM led the field in patents in the US for the 24th year in a row but, between them, the top ten companies, all technology companies (including the likes of Samsung, Google, Intel and Microsoft), accounted for more than 35,000 patents (11% of all patents issued). Apple was in 11th place with 2,102 patents. Which demonstrates all too clearly that innovation is alive and well in the IT industry. Or does it? If you look at it another way, it all depends what those patents have been issued for. Are they for real innovations or are they merely a means of forcing people to pay a tax for incorporating technology that they all would have thought of anyway into their products? Not forgetting their importance as a mean of making lawyers rich when the inevitable ...
Access this MicroScope+ Content for Free!
News in this issue
Just because a company files lots of patents does not necessarily mean that innovation is alive and well argues Billy MacInnes
In the first of an occasional series of interviews with channel personalities Nick Booth gets to ask the managing director of Cobweb about the cloud
Customers and vendors are looking for resellers that are in a position to offer real expertise around digital transformation and have undergone the process themselves